Maker Pro
Maker Pro

How best to drop ~180V?

M

Michael A. Terrell

Phil said:
"Roy L. Fuckwit"

** A criminal psychopath called Terrell is stalking me

- you FUCKING MORON.

........ Phil


Stalking? I'm laughing my ass off that you can't pass up a chance to
prove to everyone just how stupid you are. I toss out the invitation
and you jump on it like a rabid pit bull. If you were able to control
yourself, no one would pay any attention to you, even though you post a
lot of wrong information.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
T

The Real Andy

"Roy L. Fuckwit"



** A criminal psychopath called Terrell is stalking me

- you FUCKING MORON.

Get a life you granny fucking homo. You need to head in to oxford
street to see your mates and escape that landlord for a while.
 
P

Phil Allison

" Michael Asshole Terrell"

( snip more psycho abuse)


** This Terrell asshole is a criminal psychopath.

An autistic cretin & a paranoid aggressive.

Paranoid schizophrenics are incurable.






....... Phil
 
P

Phil Allison

"The Real Andy"


** This seemingly anonymous **** is "Andrew Pearson" of Brisbane,
Queensland.

He used to spend his life sucking cocks at "Jupiters Technology".

A despicable bunch of slimy, criminal cunts in the so called "gaming
industry" .

Andrew is far, far worse than any of them.

The criminal cunts booted the autistic Pearson out, over three years back.

Cos he was a useless, brain dead pile of shit.

Now the vile, autistic, psychopath, waste of space, is a full time drug
addict.


Go get fucked - Andy.






........ Phil
 
T

The Real Andy

"The Real Andy"


** This seemingly anonymous **** is "Andrew Pearson" of Brisbane,
Queensland.

He used to spend his life sucking cocks at "Jupiters Technology".

A despicable bunch of slimy, criminal cunts in the so called "gaming
industry" .

Andrew is far, far worse than any of them.

The criminal cunts booted the autistic Pearson out, over three years back.

Cos he was a useless, brain dead pile of shit.

Now the vile, autistic, psychopath, waste of space, is a full time drug
addict.


Go get fucked - Andy.


Yawn...





....... Phil
 
R

rjtucke

Thanks very much for your help. I have Art of Electronics, and am
reading it now.
 
W

Winfield Hill

rjtucke wrote...
Thanks very much for your help. I have Art of Electronics,
and am reading it now.

That's good. :)

Tell us more about your application. What are your goals?
 
W

Winfield Hill

Phil Allison wrote...
Winfield Hill

(snip massive overkill solution)

** You haven't got a fucking clue what the app is have you - Win ?
Never stops you from make a whole string a unjustified assumptions.

Ever heard of "Occam's Razor" ??

Although I'm offended by Phil's tone, which isn't conversational,
and is certainly impolite, I'll address his remarks. First, we
still don't know Ross Tucker (NS7F) rjtucke's actual application,
although he's come back with a short response. Let's assume it's
a tube amplifier of some sort, audio or RF. We also don't know if
his 520V is regulated or not, but if it was we'd assume he'd seek
a way to simply change its regulation voltage.

One might assert that actual supply voltages aren't very important
for tube amplifiers, but unregulated power supplies suffer from
ac-line variations, voltage droop under load, and ripple losses.
Arguably the voltage range resulting from the sum of these effects
compromises the best-possible performance of a tube amplifier, and
indeed one often finds a regulator employed in tube circuits.

Furthermore, if one takes an already-wide unregulated voltage range
and applies it to a lower voltage, such as 350 vs 520 volts, using
a fixed voltage drop such as with zeners, the variation compared
to the new lower voltage is nearly 50% higher. If one didn't have
a regulated supply before, he'd certainly want one now! That's my
story, and I'm sticking to it. :)

Phil suggested six 5-watt 28V zener diodes in series to drop 170V.
The 5-watt dissipation rating comes from assuming the junction is
operated at 200C (which is too high, BTW) and the zener leads are
maintained at 75C or lower. But the latter would be very difficult
to do with six closely-spaced diodes dissipating 14 watts, so even
though each zener is dissipating only 2.3W, it's likely the zener
junction temp will still approach 200C. So Ross would have to add
9 volts for 5% zener tolerance to his already-wide voltage spread,
plus up to 32 volts for the zener tempco, according to the 1n5352
datasheet. That's another 41V or 12%. It doesn't look good to me.

As a last comment, one should consider what will happen to these
series zeners under the condition of a short-circuit fault. Ask,
how much current will the 520V supply deliver into a 170V load?

While I'm not enthusiastic about fixed-voltage-dropping schemes,
if I were still to choose this, I'd make an active zener using a
power transistor and resistor to dissipate the heat, and thereby
avoid dissipation in the voltage-reference components, e.g.,

.. 20-watt adjustable-voltage active zener
..
.. n-channel MOSFET
.. 520V in 1.5k, 100W IRF620, 10W sink Vin-170V
.. ----+-------/\/\--------- d s --/\/\-+---- 100mA max
.. | g 10 |
.. | | 1n4744A |
.. | +----|<|---+ 75k 2W
.. | +---/\/\---+--/\/\--,
.. | | 1.5k |
.. | 22k gnd
.. | 1n4757A 51V 1n4753A |
.. '-|<|--|<|--|<|-+--|<|--+
.. | TL431 |
.. ,--+--|<|--+--,
.. | | |
.. '-/\/\-+-/\/\-'
.. 500k \__| 36k

The 1.5k resistor is a large one (to run cool normally, and to
handle a short-circuit), say three 500-ohm 50-watts in series.
If the voltage and current capabilities of the 520V supply are
well understood, this rating can be reduced. The resistor only
dissipates 10W under normal conditions at a full 100mA load.

The 22k resistor in the MOSFET's gate limits the zener diode
current to protect them during a short-circuit fault.

There's a 75k minimum load resistor in case there's no load.

A TL431 adjustable zener IC with 500k pot allows fine adjustment
of the voltage-dropping value, from about 155 to 190 volts. If
this feature isn't wanted, replace the 1n4753 36-volt protective
zener with a 1n4744A 15-volt zener and eliminate the '431. (One
can change the voltage-dropping range by selecting other zeners.
IRF620 mosfets are limited to 200V, but one could use an IRF720.)

A power resistor with a power transistor is better suited to
dissipating high power than modern zener diodes, and allows for
a few other features as well. But it's interesting to realize
that the circuit above is only a few steps away from becoming a
full-capability voltage regulator, rather than a mere voltage
dropper. When one considers that the most of hard work goes
into the power-handling components, heat-sinks, etc, this is a
compelling thought.
 
W

Winfield Hill

Winfield Hill wrote...
. 20-watt adjustable-voltage active zener
.
. n-channel MOSFET
. 520V in 1.5k, 100W IRF620, 10W sink Vin-170V
. ----+-------/\/\--------- d s --/\/\-+---- 100mA max
. | g 10 |
. | | 1n4744A |
. | +----|<|---+ 75k 2W
. | +---/\/\---+--/\/\--,
. | | 1.5k |
. | 22k gnd
. | 1n4757A 51V 1n4753A |
. '-|<|--|<|--|<|-+--|<|--+
. | TL431 |
. ,--+--|<|--+--,
. | | |
. '-/\/\-+-/\/\-'
. 500k \__| 36k


Correction, fixing the 22k and 1.5k resistor locations:

.. 20-watt adjustable-voltage active zener
..
.. n-channel MOSFET
.. 520V in 1.5k, 100W IRF620, 10W sink Vin-170V
.. ----+-------/\/\--------- d s --/\/\-+---- 100mA max
.. | g 10 |
.. | | |
.. | +----|<|---+
.. | | 1n4744A | 75k 2W
.. | 22k +--/\/\--,
.. | 1n4757A 51V 1n4753A | 1.5k | |
.. '-|<|--|<|--|<|-+--|<|--+---/\/\---' gnd
.. | TL431 |
.. ,--+--|<|--+--,
.. | | |
.. '-/\/\-+-/\/\-' adjustable
.. 500k \__| 36k 160V to 190V
 
P

Phil Allison

"Winfield Hill"
Although I'm offended by Phil's tone,


** ROTFL.

So this posturing Win character ACTUALLY expects folk he has regularly
publicly slandered to be polite to him ?

What an ass.

First, we
still don't know Ross Tucker (NS7F) rjtucke's actual application,


** So stop right there.

although he's come back with a short response. Let's assume it's
a tube amplifier of some sort, audio or RF.


** Far too much assuming.

Phil suggested six 5-watt 28V zener diodes in series to drop 170V.


** It is the simplest solution with a useful degree of voltage regulation
and far less dissipation that a resistive divider.

Here is what I actually posted - since Win is just about to misrepresent it
..

----------------------------------------------------------------------

" ** 6 x 5 watt zeners in series - 28 volts each.
Mounted apart on a tag strip for heatsinking and ventilation. "

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The 5-watt dissipation rating comes from assuming the junction is
operated at 200C (which is too high, BTW) and the zener leads are
maintained at 75C or lower. But the latter would be very difficult
to do with six closely-spaced diodes dissipating 14 watts,


** Told ya !!!

so even
though each zener is dissipating only 2.3W, it's likely the zener
junction temp will still approach 200C.


** Not when mounted the way I said to.

So Ross would have to add
9 volts for 5% zener tolerance to his already-wide voltage spread,
plus up to 32 volts for the zener tempco, according to the 1n5352
datasheet. That's another 41V or 12%. It doesn't look good to me.


** Once devices are fitted - there is no voltage tolerance issue.

The tempco of a 28 volt, 5W zener is +23mV/C - so each rises by only 2.5
volts in my example.

Once the zener's operating temp stabilises - there is no tempco issue.

The OP can adjust the zener string to get an exact voltage outcome.

Win has assumed the OP has a production line to deal with.

Occam is having kittens.


As a last comment, one should consider what will happen to these
series zeners under the condition of a short-circuit fault.


** A 160mA , M205 fuse will solve that nicely.





......... Phil
 
T

Tony Williams

Winfield Hill said:
A power resistor with a power transistor is better suited to
dissipating high power than modern zener diodes, and allows for
a few other features as well. But it's interesting to realize
that the circuit above is only a few steps away from becoming a
full-capability voltage regulator, rather than a mere voltage
dropper. When one considers that the most of hard work goes
into the power-handling components, heat-sinks, etc, this is a
compelling thought.

Hello Win. Let's wallow in some nostalgia.

Use a big old triode as a cathode follower, with
the grid driven by a single HV transistor (or even
another valve or MOSFET?) doing the 350V regulation.

/
| | |
520V---+---| | |
| | | |
| A G C
| | +-------+-----+-->350V
/ | | |
\ +----/\/\/----+ |
/ | | |
| | \ |
/ | / |
\ | \ |
/ c\| | +|
| |-----+-----+ ===C
| e/| _|_ | |
| | /_\ | |
| | | | |
+-------+-------+ \ |
\_|_ / |
Zener/_\ 100+V? \ |
| | |
0V------------+-------------+-----+--0V

It costs a heater transformer, but avoids the
heastsink and semiconductor protection problems.
 
W

Winfield Hill

Tony Williams wrote...
Hello Win. Let's wallow in some nostalgia.

Use a big old triode as a cathode follower, with the grid
driven by a single HV transistor (or even another valve
or MOSFET?) doing the 350V regulation.

/
| | |
520V---+----| | |
| | | |
| | \
| A G C +----+---+-----+-->350V
/ | | | |
\ +--/\/\/--' \ |
/ | / |
\ | \ |
/ c\| | +|
| |-----+-----+ ===C
| e/| _|_ | |
| | /_\ | |
| | | | |
+-------+-------' \ |
\_|_ / |
Zener/_\ 100+V? \ |
| | |
0V------------+-------------+-----+--0V

It costs a heater transformer, but avoids the heastsink
and semiconductor protection problems.

Ah yes, and a single mpsA42 transistor serves fine, thanks
to your use of a high-voltage zener, and a diode to handle
startup and short-circuit protection for the transistor.

In a regulator circuit like this tubes have the attractive
property of not requiring a pullup resistor to Vin, which
is big nuisance issue when using n-channel power MOSFETs.
One could use a depletion-mode MOSFET, but there are very
few to choose from that can handle much current or power.
 
Top