J
j
I have a prototype central solar heater which I have been tweaking and
am interested in calculating heat loss in the ducts.
Here is the way I think this would work.
Insulated ducts have an R value. I think this R value relates to the
total inside area. So, Inside Diameter * pi * length. So the heat loss
is proportional to:
ti = temperature inside duct
to = temperature outside duct
(ID * pi * l) * (ti - to) / R
units in feet.
Is that about right?
Obviously if there is no flow through the duct, there is no heat loss.
So the heat loss in BTUs must be proportional to the mass of air flowing
through the duct.
Now, I'm getting confused (at least more confused). That should be the
mass of air per hour * the specific heat of air.
The mass of air/hour = the density of ~ .075 * CFM * 60 minutes
or:
CFM * 4.5
specific heat (dry air) = .24
what the actual specific heat of 50% RH air is beyond me, but I think it
is 5 or 10% higher.
So loss in BTU/hr:
(ID * pi * l) * (ti - to) * (CFM * 4.5) * .24 * 1.1 / R
with ID and l in feet
Is that about right? It seems like I missed something, somewhere...
Jeff
am interested in calculating heat loss in the ducts.
Here is the way I think this would work.
Insulated ducts have an R value. I think this R value relates to the
total inside area. So, Inside Diameter * pi * length. So the heat loss
is proportional to:
ti = temperature inside duct
to = temperature outside duct
(ID * pi * l) * (ti - to) / R
units in feet.
Is that about right?
Obviously if there is no flow through the duct, there is no heat loss.
So the heat loss in BTUs must be proportional to the mass of air flowing
through the duct.
Now, I'm getting confused (at least more confused). That should be the
mass of air per hour * the specific heat of air.
The mass of air/hour = the density of ~ .075 * CFM * 60 minutes
or:
CFM * 4.5
specific heat (dry air) = .24
what the actual specific heat of 50% RH air is beyond me, but I think it
is 5 or 10% higher.
So loss in BTU/hr:
(ID * pi * l) * (ti - to) * (CFM * 4.5) * .24 * 1.1 / R
with ID and l in feet
Is that about right? It seems like I missed something, somewhere...
Jeff