J
Joe G \(Home\)
What's the difference between the number of GPS channels?
What is the performace difference
Thanks in Advance
Joe
What is the performace difference
Thanks in Advance
Joe
Joe said:What's the difference between the number of GPS channels?
What is the performace difference
Phil Pemberton said:More channels allows the receiver to track more satellites -- you're still
at the mercy of the number of satellites in view and signal quality,
though. Also most receivers may track satellites that are <= 30 degrees
above the horizon, but they won't use them in triangulation as the signal
will likely have suffered enough atmospheric delay and degradation to foul
up the position fix.
The receiver will be able to track more satellites, so if you've got e.g.
a six-channel receiver and four satellites in view, the receiver will use
the other two channels to scan for satellites that (according to the
almanac data) should be coming into view. Startup time should be reduced
significantly too, as e.g. a twelve-channel receiver will be able to
search for more satellites at a time.
The GPS sats send out a pseudorandom sequence (the C-code or Standard
Positioning Service) that changes at a rate of 1.024MHz. This is different
for each satellite, so you need to know which satellite you're looking for
before you go looking for it.
From a cold-start (no ephemeris, almanac or timing data), most receivers
will start hunting for a single available satellite (or more) to get a
timing lock, then go hunting for the almanac (coarse orbit data). If
you've got 12 channels, you pick (say) SVs 1 through 12 for the first
search. Chances are, you'll find at least one satellite in that range
that's visible. If there's something there (carrier lock) then the
receiver will attempt to get a "code lock" (synchronise the PRBS generator
against the satellite) and acquire timing data. If there's physically
nothing there, it'll go hunting for a different satellite on that channel.
Next you need the Almanac data to find other satellites. This takes about
15 minutes to download, but ISTR that some modern receivers will do a
download from multiple satellites -- bad packets in the stream are
replaced with ones from other satellites. I suspect if one sat is sending
(say) block 30 of 50 and another is sending block 49, some receivers will
grab blocks 30-50 from one sat, then wait for the sat sending #49 to roll
back to #1, and grab the rest of the data from there. I'm not sure if
that's how it works in real life, or if all the sats send the same part of
the Almanac at the same time.
Once the receiver has the Almanac, it goes looking for the Ephemeris
(which is transmitted individually for and by each satellite). This
improves the precision of the Almanac and allows the receiver to calculate
a position fix (assuming at least three satellites are in view and
locked).
A better place to ask this question would be the newsgroup
alt.satellite.gps...
What's the difference between the number of GPS channels?
What is the performace difference
Thanks in Advance
Joe
JosephKK said:There is no possible advantage in going above 12 channel. That is the
maximum number of active satellites that could ever be visible at any
given time. Other than that, 4 to 6 channels looks like the best
range for quality versus cost.
The GPS reciever can keep _track_ of more then 12 channels, but only
_use_ 12 in their calculations.
I don't think there are currently more then 14 flying at the moment anyway.
donald