"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:04:13 -0500, P E Schoen wrote:
You are proving my point by continued use of profanity.
Really asshole?
[snip]
Some assholes said
[snip]
That's why you're an asshole!
]snip]
someone you asshole lie and
[snip]
assholes slander and lie about Svensmark is because it means that there
[snip]
label of asshole, so wear it proudly!
Phil, is that you? Confirming my point. No sense even trying to have an
intelligent conversation with a troll exhibiting an anal orifice obsession,
or perhaps a spoiled child. But here is a site with some links for anyone
with an actual brain to examine:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s11b.htm
Just answer the martian questions !
OR stay with sound EE jobs and keep quiet about chemistry.
Marvin's long suit is that which is not yours or sam's, by far...He's not exactly hot on stuff which a physical chemist ought to know.
The martian is very exact, not you, not hot like 4th rock from the sun
unlike venus. AND all, true.
Logic, how would you know ? You are evasive as well on the questions
posed. Try some close-reading for a start.
"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:04:13 -0500, P E Schoen wrote:
You are proving my point by continued use of profanity.
Really asshole?
[snip]
Some assholes said
[snip]
That's why you're an asshole!
]snip]
someone you asshole lie and
[snip]
assholes slander and lie about Svensmark is because it means that
there
[snip]
label of asshole, so wear it proudly!
Phil, is that you? Confirming my point. No sense even trying to have
an intelligent conversation with a troll exhibiting an anal orifice
obsession,
or perhaps a spoiled child. But here is a site with some links for
anyone with an actual brain to examine:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s11b.htm
Just answer the martian questions !
OR stay with sound EE jobs and keep quiet about chemistry.
Marvin's long suit is that which is not yours or sam's, by far...
He's not exactly hot on stuff which a physical chemist ought to know.All you have to do is state the mean global temperature of the earth as a
function of carbon dioxide, and state the concentration of carbon dioxide
as a function of human emissions.Then show how these equations make useful predictions that work, and are
consistent with the past. This is called in my country "The scientific
method".
It is not. The scientific method isn't about predictions and simulation, it's
about hypothesis and experiment. Historically, practically any field of research
that was not verified by experiment was mostly bogus.
Nobody, smart or dumb, can predict the evolution of a complex chaotic system,
even if they understand all the physics and all the states and all the inputs,
which in this case nobody does.
And besides, you can do nothing about it. So why don't you design some
electronics... which can be verified by experiment.
07:01 -0800, Bill Sloman wrote:
"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:04:13 -0500, P E Schoen wrote:
You are proving my point by continued use of profanity.
Really asshole?
[snip]
Some assholes said
[snip]
That's why you're an asshole!
]snip]
someone you asshole lie and
[snip]
assholes slander and lie about Svensmark is because it means that
there
[snip]
label of asshole, so wear it proudly!
Phil, is that you? Confirming my point. No sense even trying to have
an intelligent conversation with a troll exhibiting an anal orifice
obsession,
or perhaps a spoiled child. But here is a site with some links for
anyone with an actual brain to examine:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s11b.htm
Just answer the martian questions !
OR stay with sound EE jobs and keep quiet about chemistry.
Marvin's long suit is that which is not yours or sam's, by far...
He's not exactly hot on stuff which a physical chemist ought to know..
All you have to do is state the mean global temperature of the earth as
a function of carbon dioxide, and state the concentration of carbon
dioxide as a function of human emissions.
Then show how these equations make useful predictions that work, and are
consistent with the past. This is called in my country "The scientific
method".
It is not. The scientific method isn't about predictions and simulation,
it's about hypothesis and experiment.A prediction is a hypothesis. I don't know where you get this
"simulation" stuff unless you're talking about the alarmist who use
simulations to "prove" their hypothesis. I never mentioned simulation.That's nice. Maybe I even agree with that.However, Svensmark has a climate theory that is consistent with the last
500 million years and has predicted the last 16 years, so climate isn't
one of those unknowable complex chaotic systems.
If enough people manufacture enough theories, one or two will look prettygood.
I could do a polynomial regression on climate history, publish an equation, and
look like a genius.
He pollutes s.e.d. with his climate nonsense and moronic, droning insults..
He claims he used to design electronics some decades ago.
He needs a day job.
Aren't there any Wal-Marts in Australia? Imagine Sloman as a greeter!
02:58 -0600, Marvin the Martian
44:11 -0500, "P E Schoen" <[email protected]>
wrote:
"Marvin the Martian" wrote in message
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:04:13 -0500, P E Schoen wrote:
You are proving my point by continued use of profanity.
Really asshole?
[snip]
Some assholes said
[snip]
That's why you're an asshole!
]snip]
someone you asshole lie and
[snip]
assholes slander and lie about Svensmark is because it means that
there
[snip]
label of asshole, so wear it proudly!
Phil, is that you? Confirming my point. No sense even trying to have
an intelligent conversation with a troll exhibiting an anal orifice
obsession,
or perhaps a spoiled child. But here is a site with some links for
anyone with an actual brain to examine:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s11b.htm
Just answer the martian questions !
OR stay with sound EE jobs and keep quiet about chemistry.
Marvin's long suit is that which is not yours or sam's, by far...
He's not exactly hot on stuff which a physical chemist ought to know.
All you have to do is state the mean global temperature of the earth as
a function of carbon dioxide, and state the concentration of carbon
dioxide as a function of human emissions.
Then show how these equations make useful predictions that work, and are
consistent with the past. This is called in my country "The scientific
method".
It is not. The scientific method isn't about predictions and simulation,
it's about hypothesis and experiment.
A prediction is a hypothesis. I don't know where you get this
"simulation" stuff unless you're talking about the alarmist who use
simulations to "prove" their hypothesis. I never mentioned simulation.
Simulation == fact is all Slowman talks about.
If enough people manufacture enough theories, one or two will look pretty good.
I could do a polynomial regression on climate history, publish an equation, and
look like a genius.
Hmm. Isn't that exactly what the AGW proponents have done? Good
enough for Slowman.
Why? Several here are following along. You're giving Slowman a good
spanking.
No way! Walmart greeters have to be helpful and nice to the
customers.
"Marvin the Martian" Â wrote in message
news:[email protected]...You are proving my point by continued use of profanity.Really asshole?
[snip]
Some assholes said
[snip]
That's why you're an asshole!
]snip]
someone you asshole lie and
[snip]
assholes slander and lie about Svensmark is because it means that there
[snip]
label of asshole, so wear it proudly!Phil, is that you? Confirming my point. No sense even trying to have an
intelligent conversation with a troll exhibiting an anal orifice obsession,
or perhaps a spoiled child. But here is a site with some links for anyone
with an actual brain to examine:
http://www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s11b.htmJust answer the martian questions !OR stay with sound EE jobs and keep quiet about chemistry.
Marvin's long suit is that which is not yours or sam's, by far...He's not exactly hot on stuff which a physical chemist ought to know.
The martian is very exact, not you, not hot like 4th rock from the sun
unlike venus. AND all, true.
He's certainly not precise in his expression, and seems to harbour
quite a few ideas that aren't reality based.
Logic, how would you know ? You are evasive as well on the questions
posed. Try some close-reading for a start.
Been there, done. Marvin the Martian obviously hasn't.
P.S. required electronic content: What op amp(s) would be your choice for a
quiet 600 ohm mic preamplifier? Cost no object.
Thanks,
Tom
TI owns them now, right?
You were talking about accurate descriptions.
I gave you an accurate description and now *I* have a thin skin.
Snort.
When does a scammer lead with the declaration that they are trying to
perpetrate a scam?
Why do you think the AGW scam is different?
So, no: The weasels haven't written it down.
And yet, you haven't demonstrated that what you claim is in the thread
actually exists.
In the past, I have not found it worth the effort to expend much
effort in detailing things for you.
Your "Spell out for me" demand is over the top.
Request denied.
Your own side says there has not been warming in 16 years. Take it up
with them.
Remind them that they aren't helping "the cause."
A half-dozen pal-reviewed papers. Nice.
Are you saying *no* CO2 came from dissolving coral?
Aren't the warmophobes complaining about the disappearance of coral?
Where do you think it goes?
So you don't even understand the statement, but you dispute it.
We're dealing with a real genius here, folks.
Good. You're a denialist, we'll just leave it at that.
Good. You're a denialist, we'll just leave it at that.
You need to cinch that hat on a little tighter. Its all a
conspiracy, you know. You can tell someone is trying to
perpetrate a scam because - there's no sign of a scam.
Sneaky! Same exact thing with political agendas.
I was mainly interested in the hat.
Do you go for the round
or the pointy style? What planet do the messages come from?
I didn't claim anything was in the thread other than what
people have already written. I will claim that whatever was
in the thread does exist.
In the past you have never 'detailed' a single thing, very similar
to what we are seeing here. Keep on running, boy.
I'll just assume you've got absolutely nothing.
Obvious lie.
Not.
Sure seems unlikely. Explain the process whereby ocean water
is dissolving coral skeletons and CO2 is thereby emitted into
the atmosphere.
At this point, the live coral is reportedly dying off at a
pretty rapid rate. Are you suggesting that it 'goes somewhere'
after it dies?
I provided the cite you 'needed'. Guess you didn't want it
after all.
I admit to not understanding a lot of things that don't make
any sense. But since you *do* understand it Wally, you explain it.
I told you probably a hundred times that you're making a post hoc
fallacy, and you NEVER LEARN and continue to make the same damned
logical error. What the **** is wrong with you?
What the science says, Marvin:
Though some of the CRU emails can sound damning
What the science says, Marvin:
advanced.htm
The earth is in an energy imbalance and warming rapidly, Marvin. Your
name calling and blustering is not going to change that fact!
Have you not noticed that it's you against the climate community and
most scientific societies? Have you not noticed the melting ice and
rising sea level.
How could you not notice these things?
Did you really think we could burn tens of millions of years of
sequestered carbon in just a few centuries without consequence?
Just direct Sam HERE so he can find out what "Science says":
Note current sweet article debunking the usual Sam Melting Ice is
flooding the Third World nonsense: Obviously only the VIRTUAL ice is
melting at West Antarctica.
[so-called] "Science" says:
Sam, how much science will it take until you stop lying?
Gentle ripples form in the water as the bait is slowly dragged along...
Marvin, do you notice how MANY "Global tepid" posts there are? What that
means is that Sam, by his pretend "dumb" act (well maybe it's not so
pretend) has succeeded in derailing any intelligent debate on Climate and
defused any attempts to inject actual scientific data into the
discussion. Just call it propaganda 101. The more he gets you going, the
less you are able to discuss true facts with those who are not yet aware
of the scam.
Just direct Sam HERE so he can find out what "Science says":
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
Note current sweet article debunking the usual Sam Melting Ice is
flooding the Third World nonsense: Obviously only the VIRTUAL ice is
melting at West Antarctica.
Science says:
Sam, how much science will it take until you stop lying?
It has even gone so far as to spawn death threats:
http://blog.ucsusa.org/speaking-up-for-scientists-who-receive-death- threats-2/
Paul
warming-three-times-faster-than-global-average-threatening-to-destabilize-Don't forget to look at the bigger picture, Marvin.
West Antarctica Warming Three Times Faster Than Global Average,
Threatening To Destabilize This Unstable Ice Sheet
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/12/27/1377751/west-antarctica-
Uh, that's a former TV weatherman who's been paid by Heartland. It's no
more what the science says than the National Enquirer is.
