D
Don Y
Hi Bud,
What are they trying to protect against -- a high resistance neutral?
Or, just being pedantic? This seems like a significant additional
requirement so one would assume there is a significant practical risk...
Ah, OK.
Makes sense -- a 2 wire tester would just look like a "load".
I've still not found my HiPot (though DVM doesn't turn up anything
obvious with NO load). Ah, well... I've still got a few months
before I'll *need* that circuit! :-/
GFCIs will trip on a N-G short with no load current.
There is a second
current transformer that tries to put a small common mode current in
both the H and N wire.
What are they trying to protect against -- a high resistance neutral?
Or, just being pedantic? This seems like a significant additional
requirement so one would assume there is a significant practical risk...
If there is a N-G short the resulting current
will trip the GFCI. The CT current is obviously not needed for a H-G
trip, but if the GFCI is reverse H-N wired the common mode current will
trip it if there is a actual N-to-ground short, which now goes through
the GFCI on the H terminals.
Ah, OK.
Other trivia - for a GFCI receptacle the load terminals used to be
connected to the receptacle. If the GFCI was reverse line-load wired the
test button would appear to work but the GFCI receptacle was not
protected. Wiring downstream was protected. The recommended test is to
plug in a lamp and make sure it goes out when the test button is pushed.
Recent GFCIs disconnect the internal receptacle from both line and load
on a trip. If reverse line-load wired the receptacle is still not
protected, but if tripped the GFCI can not be reset. For that reason
they are shipped tripped.
As someone wrote, the internal test for GFCIs connects around the CT,
and GFCIs make no connection to the ground wire. But a plug-in GFCI
tester will not work if there is no ground.
Makes sense -- a 2 wire tester would just look like a "load".
I've still not found my HiPot (though DVM doesn't turn up anything
obvious with NO load). Ah, well... I've still got a few months
before I'll *need* that circuit! :-/