C
Curbie
"GEET users ARE getting results."
Yeah reporter.
Moron
Yeah reporter.
Moron
Curbie said:"GEET users ARE getting results."
Yeah reporter.
Moron
Employing few people good, employing many people bad.Four legs good, two legs bad.
Curbie said:Employing few people good, employing many people bad.
Small tax base good, large tax base bad.
Orwellian oxy for the moron.
A confused fool.
20 plus percent increase is easy....over inflate your tires and keepAnyone who doesn't agree with you must be crazy.
<<<<<
Someone who immediately insults and then says it is all lies is a total
idiot. MIT have had results - reproducible - which he ignores, and many
around the world are seeing something happening. Who do I believe? MIT
and those around the world or a fool - who's probably under pay from a
large corporation.
Something is there. What would you need to do to get 20-30% more mpg in
an existing IC engine's design using existing untreated fuels? If GM
made a car that was 30% better in mpg the media would be all over it.
More gibberish from you - the start of my FIRST post - "Google plasma,MIT have had results - reproducible - which he ignores
Now, you're back to the, advocating a technology to others, that you, and many around the world are seeing something happening.
The plasmatron and GEET are NOT the same.Who do I believe? MIT and those around the world or a fool - who's probably under pay from a large corporation.
More proselytizing.Something is there.
Some facts and an understanding of the process, but you beingWhat would you need to do to get 20-30% more mpg in an existing IC engine's design using existing untreated fuels?
YA THINK, do you really think it's possible that not a single engineerIf GM made a car that was 30% better in mpg the media would be all over it.
Do you even read what you write, a perfect description of your rant.
MIT's plasmatron, designed by engineers, is not the same thing as GEET
designed by, and I quote YOU "Pantone didn't understand fully what was
going on", I never ignored MIT's designs, just your gibberish.
...
Something is there. What would you need to do to get 20-30% more mpg in an
existing IC engine's design using existing untreated fuels? If GM made a
car that was 30% better in mpg the media would be all over it.
Jim,Babbling idiots like you make competent researchers hesitant to attach
their names and reputations to risky, speculative projects. You
actually hurt the search for viable alternatives.
I am on about the engine not the body, or an old Honda or whatever. Get the
best power/weight ratio IC engine and get 30% better mpg. If that happened
the TV would be having programs on it.
...
I am on about the engine not the body, or an old Honda or whatever. Get
the
best power/weight ratio IC engine and get 30% better mpg. If that happened
the TV would be having programs on it.
Curbie said:Jim,
You have a knack