Pete said:
Victor Roberts wrote:
Visibility is indeed higher since the peak emissions are higher.
State your source. Note that this thread has been linked to
sci.engr.lighting. We lighting experts know what you're saying is
incorrect. If all you're doing is throwing back information that LED
sales people have given you, then you and they are mistaken.
The
flicker also attracts attention better. I've seen LED lights on a number
of trucks where the flicker frequency had to be in the mid 20 Hz range.
By what meter do you judge this? I see all manner of lights from
continuous sources to PWMs at 20 kHz or more. Once the pulse rate
increases beyond 5 Hz, it becomes very difficult to estimate a flash
rate by eye alone. I can't believe you're taking a light detector
hooked to an oscilloscope to determine a PWM pulse rate of an LED lamp
on a truck.
And your point is? They still operate with peak emissions that would
incinerate the strobe tube in seconds if they were continuous.
The point is that the eye is an integrator - it sees only the average
light output of sources pulsing at the frequencies we're discussing.
Same principle that allows people to see an image on the TV. Your
comment regarding strobe tubes incinerating is totally irrelevant to the
subject at hand. We're trying to educate you - you're trying to bully
your point through.
Peak intensity is only relevant for slow flash rates - below the '20 Hz'
you stated above. Warning lamps flash in the 1 - 4 Hz range where the
peak intensity does increase conspicuity (not visibility as is often
misused in this case as you are doing). Once all those flashes merge
into a continuous beam, conspicuity decreases.