Someone named
[email protected] (AlarmReview) Proclaimed on 11 May
2004 17:47:22 GMT,
HEY!, he's not a dork, he's a Dumb-Ass.
Thanks for clearing that up jackass.
He's going to go nuts trying to prove his point but in the interest of sanity,
I'll cut him off at this point with the answer.
Your answer does not satisfy me - I'll explain.
Vonage is simply a means of
voice communications over the internet.
I know what Vonage is. In fact I think I was the first one to write
something about it in this NG over a year ago.
I know.
So if your
using DSL, a filter will work.
That's because you still have the POTS functionality. The alarm
system will still be tied to it, not the Vonage phone adapter.
If your using cable, their demarc gateway will
work.
The "gateway" is what Vonage calls a phone adapter. In the true
meaning your router is in effect your "gateway".
I'm still not sure what you mean by this. Port 1 on the Vonage "phone
adapter" is what basically amounts to a virtual POTS line, is that
what you meant?
You have a friend?
His response
was simply that consumers don't initially disconnect their local phone service
when they get Vonage. So if they are using DSL, the alarm is communicating
normally over the telco lines, with the filter, and it's NOT connecting via the
Vonage.
So the existing filter is still doing what it's supposed to do. Has
nothing to do with ADDING a DSL filter like you implied.
After a month or so, the consumer terminates their local phone service
and wham, the alarm can't communicate.
Well duh. The alarm is still wired to the OUTSIDE demark, not the
Vonage virtual POTS.
He said the consumer has only four
choices under this situation. 1, keep some form of local service. 2, Connect
the alarm directly to the gateway's POTS jacks and loose line seizure. 3. Buy
a panel designed to communicate VOIP.
Were not getting to the heart of the matter here Rob. IF the Vonage
"virtual POTS" (port 1 of the phone adapter) can be proven to work
with panel dialers and alarm receivers, the ONLY sensible way to do it
would be option 2. But why would you have to give up line seizure?
Take the output of the phone adapter and wire directly to red & green
of the RJ-31, they gray and brown would be tied into the existing
house phone wiring.
I would also like to note that perhaps one reason why these setups
are not working for some is because the wiring. Some people may be
plugging port 1 into a phone jack to distribute the virtual POTS
through the house. This is great, but I bet they are not unhooking
the feed wire from the demark. Even though the local service was
discontinued a voltage stays on the line for months before the TELCO
disconnects "talk battery". I'd bet that is a possible cause of
interference.
No, the question is, will Vonage work with alarm panels and receivers
if everything else is wired and configured correctly. Try to pay
attention.
-Graham
SELECT * FROM users WHERE clue > 0
No results found in alt.security.alarms