Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Audio Delay Circuit

R

Rich Grise

I read in sci.electronics.design that martin griffith


That's far too sophisticated.

Well, who was it that suggested un-pinching the pinch roller on one
of the decks? And tying them together shouldn't be that hard - if
the two decks have the heads at the same height off the baseplate,
just a piece of scrap metal could keep them aligned. Sounds like it
should be a walk in the park. :)

(I used to do the alignment on 8-track players in the Radio Shack
repair shop. It was surprisingly easy to get them good enough to
get out the door. ;-) )

Cheers!
Rich
 
R

Rich Grise

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields


Yes, even 20 ft or so apart. You need intermediate support for the tape,
of course.

At 3.75 IPS, 10 seconds is only 37.5 inches, just under a 'metre'. ;-)

Mr. Woodgate, I suspect you're pulling our chain yet again. ;-P

Cheers!
Rich
 
R

Rich Grise

Yep, broadcast "profanity delays" for phone-ins, before ITC came out
with the swapped head NAB cartridge nightmare. Thats one thing
digitised audio did solve

You could do it on one stereo deck. Just use a Moebius tape loop. ;-D

Cheers!
Rich
 
J

John Woodgate

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <[email protected]>
wrote (in said:
Well, who was it that suggested un-pinching the pinch roller on one of
the decks?

You can do that on el-cheapo machines that don't have things like
capstan servos.
 
M

martin griffith

You could do it on one stereo deck. Just use a Moebius tape loop. ;-D

Cheers!
Rich
bias, erase would be a significant challenge. Nice idea though


martin
 
P

Pooh Bear

John said:
---
Pretty close!-)

The CODEC - RAM - counter scheme is the right way to go, IMO.

In another life I used to work for an outfit named "2-Tel
Interconnect Systems" and we built an audio delay based on that
scheme for use with phone patches. Jumper selectable delays, as I
recall, up to about a half a second or so, but nothing inherently
limiting the delay other than depth of RAM. Also, as I recall, we
used 64k X 1 bit of dynamic RAM.

I've searched through my old stuff and couldn't find the schematics,
but the circuit at:

http://www.eetchina.com/ARTICLES/2003AUG/PDF/2003AUG29_AMD_AN02.PDF

(which link someone posted earlier) seems to be pretty close to what
we used.

The trick is to slacken off the pinch wheel pressure on one machine ( or
indeed completely disable it )

Graham
 
J

John Woodgate

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields
_And_ the transports have to be aligned properly so that the tape won't
try to run off the capstans, and on and on, I think. Seems to me like
the long way 'round when it can be easily done with probably
substantially less than $10 worth of parts the other way(s).

Yes, it can NOW; those techniques were used when it couldn't be done
digitally.
 
J

John Fields

I read in sci.electronics.design that John Fields


Yes, even 20 ft or so apart. You need intermediate support for the tape,
of course.

---
And adequate tensioning mechanisms on both machines and God knows
what-all else, including a reason why to do it that way.

Seems a little bizarre for the OP's needs when for less than $10
worth of parts he can easily build it out of silicon.
 
R

Rich Grise

And adequate tensioning mechanisms on both machines and God knows
what-all else, including a reason why to do it that way.

Seems a little bizarre for the OP's needs when for less than $10
worth of parts he can easily build it out of silicon.

I'd be interested in seeing this circuit.

Thanks!
Rich
 
J

Jim Thompson

Heaven sakes, Jim! I had to go back and check the thread to see what
in the world you were talking about! :)

But, yes, a drum would work too - see "G-15 drum memory":
http://www.computermuseum.li/Testpage/DRUM-Memory-BendixG15computer.htm

Obviously, it would have to spin verrrrry sloooooowwwwwly... :)

Cheers!
Rich

3.75ips, for 5 second delay, would only be ~6 inches in diameter,
rotating at 12rpm ;-)

Maybe you could slow down a hard-drive ?:)

...Jim Thompson
 

Similar threads

Top