Nico said:
With solder mask, white print and plated holes?
(I like yellow silkscreen better because it contrasts more.)
You are right. A milled board does not have any of those things
unless one applies them later. The purpose of the board is
simply to verify proper operation of the electronics; not
even as a 'first article' product.
Within a week? What is taking so long?
The manual process of creating a toolpath for the cutter in G-code.
That's why I'm asking for the opinion of other folks that have
also made PCBs using the milling process. Not photolithography.
Milling. The application of a mechanical cutter to remove undesirable
copper from a laminated substrate. Not the use of resist and acid
to etch away the copper. I've had boards made using that process and
am comfortable with it and understand its strengths.
I would like information about people's experiences with the
mechanical rather than the electrochemical process though.
I'm really trying to be clear here.
Quick turn around PCB manufacturers can get you a PCB within 3 days
(including shipping).
You misspelled 'two weeks' in the context of a reasonably priced PCB.
I agree making a PCB yourself is always faster
(a matter of hours) but the end result cannot be compared with a PCB
made by a PCB manufacturer.
Sure it can.
* Fewer unnecessary features
* Much higher cost for tools to create the board unless you already
own the hardware.
* Very much cheaper and faster if the toolpath delay can be solved
* Admittedly a much greater time commitment.
There are many other points of comparison as well.
Can we please stop beating the 'photo lithography horse'?
I've used that process before and will use it in the future.
It is outside the context of my question, though.
--Winston