G
Genome
Instead of
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
DNA
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
DNA
Instead of
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
Instead of
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
DNA
Genome said:Instead of
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
Fuses. Krytrons. Detonators. Anything else?
John
Spehro said:Thermal cutoffs.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Genome said:Instead of
'Absolute Maximum Ratings'
Data sheets should be specified with
'Use Once Ratings'
Yep, one of the ClassicsMy favorite was the graph of "Number of pins remaining vs Number of
socket insertions" for the Signetics 25125 WOM.
Tim.
Rene Tschaggelar said:Eg physicist colleagues of mine consider 'Absolute
Maximum Ratings' as safety margins that can easily
be exceede by 20%. Repeatedly.
"Approximate number of pirates versus the average global temperature
over the last 200 years".
It does not seem to include the Somalia based pirates though.
Maybe this is too recent to cause a downturn in Climate change
martin griffith
I think i have a copy of that somewhere.Tim said:My favorite was the graph of "Number of pins remaining vs Number of
socket insertions" for the Signetics 25125 WOM.
Tim.
Rene said:These 'Absolute Maximum Ratings' have a different
meaning for different people anyway.
I think i have a copy of that somewhere.
Could it be legally posted (their copyright was on it as i remember)?
Tim said:I consider them a personal challenge set to me by the manufacturer.
Like the pair of "one size fits all" pants, that ripped after only 4
people!
Or the bomb-proof trash containers that the local government buys, that
are supposed to contain a stick of dynamite exploding. Now THAT sounds
like a dare to me!
Tim.
A rep from Semikron once proudly announced their new "rupture proof"
IGBT modules. We got one, attached it to a PCB with 6.6mF bus caps,
shorted the other device, cranked it up to 900V and turned it on. The
package didnt rupture but the assembly leaped 12" or so into the air.
So we did it again, but sat an anvil on top of the PCB. BLAMMO, it
destroyed itself completely, spraying "japanese snot" (we used Fuji
IGBTs for many years hence the term) everywhere. The rep was suitably
embarassed, and somewhat scared
Cheers
Terry
Sounds like what happened to a induction heating setup when i put in theTerry said:A rep from Semikron once proudly announced their new "rupture proof"
IGBT modules. We got one, attached it to a PCB with 6.6mF bus caps,
shorted the other device, cranked it up to 900V and turned it on. The
package didnt rupture but the assembly leaped 12" or so into the air.
So we did it again, but sat an anvil on top of the PCB. BLAMMO, it
destroyed itself completely, spraying "japanese snot" (we used Fuji
IGBTs for many years hence the term) everywhere. The rep was suitably
embarassed, and somewhat scared
Cheers
Terry
Terry said:A rep from Semikron once proudly announced their new "rupture proof"
IGBT modules. We got one, attached it to a PCB with 6.6mF bus caps,
shorted the other device, cranked it up to 900V and turned it on. The
package didnt rupture but the assembly leaped 12" or so into the air.
So we did it again, but sat an anvil on top of the PCB. BLAMMO, it
destroyed itself completely, spraying "japanese snot" (we used Fuji
IGBTs for many years hence the term) everywhere. The rep was suitably
embarassed, and somewhat scared
Cheers
Terry
900V? Was the IGBT rated for that voltage?
Reminds me of those "fireproof" safes... sure, put a thermonuclear
device in one of dem dare fireproof safes, and we'll see who's
fireproof...
Jim said:Sounds like the time I burned an extension cord the whole length of a
lab bench... burned across the table just like a dynamite fuse ;-)
...Jim Thompson