Sir Kelly B . . . . .
Looking at your
WHOLE bag of marbles and evaluatig the SHAFT sizes and the miniscule rotor and fine wire utilized . . . . methinks . . . . .this is being a sensor related function.
Could you check your unit and see how many of my YELLOW mark up segments there are all around the unit . . . I'm guestimating from what I am able to see that there are going to be 16, which would divide by 2 as being 8 pole pairs.
My
PINK arrow is marking where you need to inspect as being copper wire pairs coming down from the windings on the poles at the top.
Then suspicioning that they are then forming individual mu-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-u-ltiple turn copper wire coils around that CHARTREUSE ferrite core dumbell coil form, with its resultant round N and S poles being where my
CHARTREUSE square markings on the rings are.
Those windings will be wound in the direction of my BLUE arrow.
I am seeing that now, two aspects are being totally amiss, admittedley being on another non shown section.
That should be two or more magnets associated with magnetically inducing their field into the rotor at the top.
AND another ferrite based coil akin to the coil at the bottom, and it will be dumbell style also but with it being
HOLLOW in order to accept the bottom
CHARTREUSE coil that we just covered . It needs that coil to drop down into it . . . a la the white and black arrow path . . . and have the ferrrite rings aligned with each other, yet only be having about a .005 inch clearace from their touching, as the shaft rotates.
This construction would constitute a rotary transformer and lets data be transferred magnetically from a rotating object . . . . with no electrically noisy, failure prone / related slip rings or brushes.
ASSOCIATED PHOTO ILLUSTRATION . . . . .
73's de Edd . . . . .
Soooooo, about this 'a here fuzzy logic, that I am hearing more and more about . . . . . . . . does it tickle?