Maker Pro
Login Join Maker Pro
Or sign in with

Menu

Connect With Us

Network

Maker Pro

Speeding optoisolators

J

James Arthur

Sometimes you need a low-power, moderately fast optoisolator.
Here's a simple-minded little rig I hooked up on my bench.
It's not much, but the circuits and measurements might hold
interest for some.

Here's the plain, standard circuit (view in fixed font):


FIGURE 1. +5V
========== -+-
|
R1 |
1.5k 1/2 |
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 |
| OPTO |
.--. .- .---|---------/--.
| | | | --- |/ |
--' '--' | \ / ---> | |
4v p-p | -+- |>. | .--. .-
'---|----------|-' | | |
- >-------------' | --' '--'
+--------> 4.8v p-p
| 3.5KHz max
\ R2
/ 2.2k
\
|
===
GND


Above about 3.5KHz the output no longer swings rail-to-rail,
quickly becoming unusable at higher frequencies.

The opto's slow output transistor limits response time, but
that's easily improved:


+5V +5v
FIGURE 2. -+- -+-
========== | |
\ |
R22 / |
1k \ .'
R21 | |< Q21
1.5k 1/2 +--------| 2n3906 .--.
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 | |\ | |
| OPTO | \ --' '--
.--. .---|---------/--. +------> 4.8v p-p
| | | --- |/ | | >100KHz
--' '-- | \ / ---> | | / tr ~300nS
4v p-p | -+- |>. | \ R23 tf ~1uS
| | | | / 4.7k
'---|----------|-' |
- >-------------' | |
=== ===
GND GND


Q21 prevents the opto's output transistor from saturating
and limits its voltage swing.

The same optoisolator, so equipped, now passes a 110KHz
squarewave, or 1.0uS pulses at 320KHz in my unit.

The speed limitation is still storage time in the opto's output
transistor, so anti-sat tricks on Q21 aren't helpful or needed.

Running the LED at low power ensures a very long lifetime.

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
D

D from BC

Sometimes you need a low-power, moderately fast optoisolator.
Here's a simple-minded little rig I hooked up on my bench.
It's not much, but the circuits and measurements might hold
interest for some.

Here's the plain, standard circuit (view in fixed font):


FIGURE 1. +5V
========== -+-
|
R1 |
1.5k 1/2 |
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 |
| OPTO |
.--. .- .---|---------/--.
| | | | --- |/ |
--' '--' | \ / ---> | |
4v p-p | -+- |>. | .--. .-
'---|----------|-' | | |
- >-------------' | --' '--'
+--------> 4.8v p-p
| 3.5KHz max
\ R2
/ 2.2k
\
|
===
GND


Above about 3.5KHz the output no longer swings rail-to-rail,
quickly becoming unusable at higher frequencies.

The opto's slow output transistor limits response time, but
that's easily improved:


+5V +5v
FIGURE 2. -+- -+-
========== | |
\ |
R22 / |
1k \ .'
R21 | |< Q21
1.5k 1/2 +--------| 2n3906 .--.
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 | |\ | |
| OPTO | \ --' '--
.--. .---|---------/--. +------> 4.8v p-p
| | | --- |/ | | >100KHz
--' '-- | \ / ---> | | / tr ~300nS
4v p-p | -+- |>. | \ R23 tf ~1uS
| | | | / 4.7k
'---|----------|-' |
- >-------------' | |
=== ===
GND GND


Q21 prevents the opto's output transistor from saturating
and limits its voltage swing.

The same optoisolator, so equipped, now passes a 110KHz
squarewave, or 1.0uS pulses at 320KHz in my unit.

The speed limitation is still storage time in the opto's output
transistor, so anti-sat tricks on Q21 aren't helpful or needed.

Running the LED at low power ensures a very long lifetime.

Cheers,
James Arthur
Click to expand...

Yawnnnn... :O
Now..2.1Ghz RF coupling digital isolators are interesting..
Tprop < 10nS
150Mbps
2500VRMS isolation
http://www.silabs.com/tgwWebApp/public/web_content/products/Digital_Power/Isolators/en/Si844x.htm


D from BC
 
J

John Larkin

Sometimes you need a low-power, moderately fast optoisolator.
Here's a simple-minded little rig I hooked up on my bench.
It's not much, but the circuits and measurements might hold
interest for some.

Here's the plain, standard circuit (view in fixed font):


FIGURE 1. +5V
========== -+-
|
R1 |
1.5k 1/2 |
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 |
| OPTO |
.--. .- .---|---------/--.
| | | | --- |/ |
--' '--' | \ / ---> | |
4v p-p | -+- |>. | .--. .-
'---|----------|-' | | |
- >-------------' | --' '--'
+--------> 4.8v p-p
| 3.5KHz max
\ R2
/ 2.2k
\
|
===
GND


Above about 3.5KHz the output no longer swings rail-to-rail,
quickly becoming unusable at higher frequencies.

The opto's slow output transistor limits response time, but
that's easily improved:


+5V +5v
FIGURE 2. -+- -+-
========== | |
\ |
R22 / |
1k \ .'
R21 | |< Q21
1.5k 1/2 +--------| 2n3906 .--.
+ >----/\/\/----. MOCD217 | |\ | |
| OPTO | \ --' '--
.--. .---|---------/--. +------> 4.8v p-p
| | | --- |/ | | >100KHz
--' '-- | \ / ---> | | / tr ~300nS
4v p-p | -+- |>. | \ R23 tf ~1uS
| | | | / 4.7k
'---|----------|-' |
- >-------------' | |
=== ===
GND GND


Q21 prevents the opto's output transistor from saturating
and limits its voltage swing.

The same optoisolator, so equipped, now passes a 110KHz
squarewave, or 1.0uS pulses at 320KHz in my unit.

The speed limitation is still storage time in the opto's output
transistor, so anti-sat tricks on Q21 aren't helpful or needed.

Running the LED at low power ensures a very long lifetime.

Cheers,
James Arthur
Click to expand...


How about this?

http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=optoppdr1.jpg

If the transient led current is large but the dc current is low, the
transistors will switch fast but not saturate too hard. Of course, b-e
resistors always help, too.

John
 
J

James Arthur

How about this?

http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=optoppdr1.jpg

If the transient led current is large but the dc current is low, the
transistors will switch fast but not saturate too hard. Of course, b-e
resistors always help, too.

John
Click to expand...

Cute. I might rig one up, just for fun.

I s'pose the next step would be doing clever anti-sat stuff to the
phototransistor, if we had access to its base (not available on the
MOCD217 (which I have a reel of (my junk box is well-stocked))).

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
D

D from BC

Hey, 100kHz, isolated, for pennies and 2 parts is a decent upgrade for
a dogmeat junk-box opto.

All I needed was 20kHz, so 'good enough' is good enough, right?

Besides, using transformers is cheating. :)

Cheers,
James Arthur
Click to expand...

I'm wondering if LED capacitance is significant...


D from BC
 
T

Tim Williams

I once made an inverter like that, using 2N4401/03. Nice and sharp edges
(in the 40ns range IIRC), gotta be careful not to leave the input
disconnected, in an ambiguous logic state, though! ;-)

Tim
 
J

John Larkin

Cute. I might rig one up, just for fun.

I s'pose the next step would be doing clever anti-sat stuff to the
phototransistor, if we had access to its base (not available on the
MOCD217 (which I have a reel of (my junk box is well-stocked))).

Cheers,
James Arthur
Click to expand...


Well, to go really fast you'd want a phototransistor (or better yet
photodiode) to work in pure current mode, into a TIA.

http://www.highlandtechnology.com/DSS/J730DS.html

This uses a silicon (for 850 nm) or InGaAs (for longer stuff) pin
diode detector driving a current-mode opamp as the tia. Analog bw is
about 200 MHz, which would be faster if I'd bothered to put more
voltage across the pin detector. I should have done that.

All non-avalanche photodiodes tend to have a sensitivity in the
ballpark of 0.5 amps/watt. If you illuminate them from an led, they
have to be big and slow to capture the fuzzy light. If you use a
laser, through fiber maybe, they can be a lot smaller and faster.


John
 
J

John Larkin

I'm wondering if LED capacitance is significant...
Click to expand...

Sure, especially c-b (Miller) capacitance. And there's nothing to
discharge the base here except base current itself.


John
 
J

James Arthur

I'm wondering if LED capacitance is significant...

D from BC
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Let's see: Fairchild's datasheet says 18pF, x 1.5k is about a
30nS time-constant, so I'd have to say "no," not a factor.

Storage time in the phototransistor is the main limitation, so
optimizing its drive & load is a good first step. Next would be
preventing all transistors (photo, especially, and Q1) from
saturating.

John's totem-pole actively jerks the phototransistors out of
saturation, so that'd be a nice speed-up that's not too critical about
exact photocurrent and load--just rip the things 'off'. It takes two
opto channels and bipolar drive for their LEDs, but it's brutally
elegant for speed.

All of this is pretty simple and low-power, which is nice.

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
J

John Larkin

'The J730 is compatible with the Highland J720 E/O Conveter,'

My spell sjeker says it is ConveRter.
Click to expand...

It's amazing how hard it is to get every last technical and
spelling/punctuation error out of datasheets and web pages. I sure
hope this one hasn't cost us a lot in sales.

John
 
V

Vladimir Vassilevsky

This will smoke eventually. The opto current is not limited.

How about this?

http://img240.imageshack.us/my.php?image=optoppdr1.jpg
Click to expand...

Much better idea however it takes two optocouplers instead of one and
will smoke if the input is unconnected. BTW I wouldn't be concerned
about the speed of the LEDs compared to that of the photo transistor.
If the transient led current is large but the dc current is low, the
transistors will switch fast but not saturate too hard. Of course, b-e
resistors always help, too.
Click to expand...

Once we had a problem with decoupling of RS-232 via H11L1. There was a
big difference in the speed (several times) depending on the particular
make and the particular part. The board was already made; the trivial
solution was just pick the fastest parts from the box :)


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
 
J

James Arthur

Well, to go really fast you'd want a phototransistor (or better yet
photodiode) to work in pure current mode, into a TIA.
Click to expand...

Yep. That's the reason for Q21, which serves as a kind of fast TIA on
the cheap.

Photodiode-mode would be much faster, eliminating phototransistor
storage time, but my opto doesn't offer up the base. If it did,
substituting the back-biased photojunction and adjusting R23 should
speed things up a lot.
http://www.highlandtechnology.com/DSS/J730DS.html
Click to expand...

Nice, as usual for HTI gear.

James
 
J

James Arthur

This will smoke eventually. The opto current is not limited.
Click to expand...

Not so. The opto's current transfer ratio (CTR) limits the
phototransistor's current. Since the LED current is about 2mA, the
output current is about the same, and the opto's phototransistor will
dissipate 10mW, typical. The detector in the specified opto can
safely dissipate 150mW, which would be quite impossible given the
combination of limited LED current, CTR of roughly 100%, and 5v
supply.
Much better idea however it takes two optocouplers instead of one and
will smoke if the input is unconnected.
Click to expand...

No, it won't smoke for the same reason as above. Remember, these are
being run at especially low drive currents, which changes the game.
In this case, two LED drops plus two limiting resistors set the LEDs'
current to much less than half if the input is open. The two output
transistors can easily take it.
BTW I wouldn't be concerned
about the speed of the LEDs compared to that of the photo transistor.
Click to expand...

Agreed, at least at this level of performance.

Once we had a problem with decoupling of RS-232 via H11L1. There was a
big difference in the speed (several times) depending on the particular
make and the particular part. The board was already made; the trivial
solution was just pick the fastest parts from the box :)
Click to expand...

That's one way, for sure!

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
V

Vladimir Vassilevsky

James Arthur wrote:

Not so. The opto's current transfer ratio (CTR) limits the
phototransistor's current.
Click to expand...

I feel suspiciously about the circuits with the potentially unlimited
escalation of the current. The datasheet guarantees the minimal CTR but
it says nothing about the maximal.
Since the LED current is about 2mA, the
output current is about the same, and the opto's phototransistor will
dissipate 10mW, typical. The detector in the specified opto can
safely dissipate 150mW, which would be quite impossible given the
combination of limited LED current, CTR of roughly 100%, and 5v
supply.
Click to expand...

Yes, it won't smoke at once, but it will smoke eventually.


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
 
R

Rich Grise

opto channels and bipolar drive for their LEDs, but it's brutally
elegant for speed.
Click to expand...

"Brutally elegant"?

Sounds a little creepy. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
R

Rich Grise

It's amazing how hard it is to get every last technical and
spelling/punctuation error out of datasheets and web pages. I sure
hope this one hasn't cost us a lot in sales.
Click to expand...

I'm available to do proofreading - I'm the self-appointed chief of
the Apostrophe Police, after all. ;-)

And, of course, at times I branch out to the Spelling Police (I
used to win contests), Grammar Police, and "Does-it-make-any-sense"
police. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
J

Jim Thompson

James Arthur wrote:



I feel suspiciously about the circuits with the potentially unlimited
escalation of the current. The datasheet guarantees the minimal CTR but
it says nothing about the maximal.


Yes, it won't smoke at once, but it will smoke eventually.


Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultant
http://www.abvolt.com
Click to expand...

My maxim is a twist on Murphy... if there's ANY chance of smoke, no
matter how minute, there WILL be smoke.

...Jim Thompson
 
J

James Arthur

I feel suspiciously about the circuits with the potentially unlimited
escalation of the current. The datasheet guarantees the minimal CTR but
it says nothing about the maximal.
Click to expand...

Minimum CTR at 10mA is 100%, typical is 130%. From the datasheet(*),
at 2mA LED current CTR is typically 75% for an output current would be
about 1.5mA. 30mA would be the maximum allowed, dissipation-wise.

(*) http://www.fairchildsemi.com/ds/MO/MOCD217-M.pdf

Those spreads look pretty tight to me, so I'm perfectly comfortable
with my 2,000% safety margin, but if you aren't, you could add a small
collector resistor to the opto. I wouldn't, but you could.
Yes, it won't smoke at once, but it will smoke eventually.
Click to expand...

Let's do the math. With input floating, if John used 1.5k resistors,
the LED current would be from 4v - (2 led drops) passing through 2 x
1.5k ohm resistors. That amounts to (4v - 2.2v) / 3k ohms = 600uA.
At these currents the opto's CTR drops, so output current will be just
220uA (typical), for a safety margin of 13,600%. John's version is
_very_ safe.
Vladimir Vassilevsky
DSP and Mixed Signal Design Consultanthttp://www.abvolt.com
Click to expand...

Cheers,
James Arthur
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FuZZ1L0G1C
Speeding up and re-using Ferric Chloride etchant tips:
Replies
2
Views
1K
MidNor
M
G
Digital Clock Speeding Up (ie Gaining Time)
Replies
10
Views
15K
[email protected]
G
E
[HELP] Optoisolators in series
Replies
11
Views
2K
davenn
davenn
W
Problems with industrial battery chargers and optoisolators
Replies
7
Views
1K
Frithiof Andreas Jensen
F
T
Optoisolators
Replies
2
Views
921
Frithiof Andreas Jensen
F
Top