I have a number of devices which use a pair of NiMH batteries.
Clearly the charger is rubbish because the batteries get quite hot whilst on charge (which they are almost 24x7)
My thought is to replace a pair of these batteries with a single 10440 LiFePO4 cell with a "charger" in the space used for the other cell.
Here is my idea:
U1 is a "voltage detector which has a low output when the voltage exceeds 3.2V and high when it exceeds it (there is actually a 5% hysteresis, see here).
Q1 is an 8V P channel mosfet that can pass about 10A at Vgs = 2.5V. (See here) The purpose of this is to prevent the battery from charging once the battery voltage exceeds 3.2V.
D1 is a schottky diode which provides a discharge path when the mosfet is off (with higher performance than the body diode).
OK, so the idea is that the existing charger limits the current to the battery, and the voltage detector stops the charging when the battery approaches full charge. D1 reduces the voltage drop across Q1's body diode while the battery voltage remains above about 3.2V.
Does anyone see any problems with this? (edit: apart from the fact that the first version had the mosfet around the wrong way!)
Clearly the charger is rubbish because the batteries get quite hot whilst on charge (which they are almost 24x7)
My thought is to replace a pair of these batteries with a single 10440 LiFePO4 cell with a "charger" in the space used for the other cell.
Here is my idea:
U1 is a "voltage detector which has a low output when the voltage exceeds 3.2V and high when it exceeds it (there is actually a 5% hysteresis, see here).
Q1 is an 8V P channel mosfet that can pass about 10A at Vgs = 2.5V. (See here) The purpose of this is to prevent the battery from charging once the battery voltage exceeds 3.2V.
D1 is a schottky diode which provides a discharge path when the mosfet is off (with higher performance than the body diode).
OK, so the idea is that the existing charger limits the current to the battery, and the voltage detector stops the charging when the battery approaches full charge. D1 reduces the voltage drop across Q1's body diode while the battery voltage remains above about 3.2V.
Does anyone see any problems with this? (edit: apart from the fact that the first version had the mosfet around the wrong way!)
Attachments
Last edited: