Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Planned Obselescence....A Good Thing?

D

dpb

Too_Many_Tools said:
Sorry but I did not mention what education background I have....none of
your business. ;<)

The cost of handling a product would be factored into the original sale
price...and the company producing it would be liable for disposal.

Yeah, that was Iggy, but maybe you should look into it... :)

How could you possibly even approximately compute a realistic future
cost of handling any given product a priori, what more actually make it
reflect some "true" cost?

Previously you spoke of transportation as some over-arching cost of
consumer electronics, but whatever cost there is for it is already
incorporated at the retail point, obviously. So, when costs are
lowered to the end user by the use of integration and other modern
manufacturing techniques and lower overhead costs even after costs of
transportation and distribution are included, it simply means the
actual manufacturing cost itself is even lower than it appears. Again,
there's the efficiency of numbers -- it doesn't cost much more
incrementally to ship a carload of an item than it does a single one.

As for the disposal, the consumer already pays for disposal of the
items he discards through a variety of mechanisms--taxes, user fees,
private collection fees, etc., etc., etc., ... As noted previously,
various locations have already begun accounting for large and or
otherwise difficult-to-dispose-of items. This trend will undoubtedly
continue and will be far more efficient than a "one size fits all"
attempt could ever be.

As (and/or if) materials become more valuable, there will certainly be
more recycling as it becomes economically viable. The only reason at
present it isn't more prevalent is that it is not cost-effective. When
there is economic incentive, it will happen--until then, despite all
well-intentioned pleas in the world, it just won't.

You may not like that answer, but it's more reflective of reality... :)
 
T

Too_Many_Tools

Rod said:
Pigs arse it is.


Nope, nothing will change, you watch.

LOL...sure they will.

That must be why they are going from country to country dumping toxic
waste until they get chased out.

Or why they have been forced to go to lead free solder.

The free ride the electronics industry has been getting is coming to an
end.

And with it is the age of artificially cheap electronics...

TMT
 
E

Edwin Pawlowski

Too_Many_Tools said:
That must be why they are going from country to country dumping toxic
waste until they get chased out.

Or why they have been forced to go to lead free solder.

The free ride the electronics industry has been getting is coming to an
end.

And with it is the age of artificially cheap electronics...

TMT

There is a plant being built in Florida just to recycle electronic parts.
It is becoming profitable on some level. There is certainly enough "raw
material" to be had.
 
R

Rod Speed

Too_Many_Tools said:
Rod Speed wrote
LOL...sure they will.

Laughing like a village eejut changes nothing.
That must be why they are going from country to
country dumping toxic waste until they get chased out.

Just another of you silly little fantasys. Doesnt happen
with the discarded consumer electronics being discussed.
Or why they have been forced to go to lead free solder.

Pity nothing special is required when disposing of the old stuff.
The free ride the electronics industry has been getting is coming to an end.
Fantasy.

And with it is the age of artificially cheap electronics...

Nothing artifical about it and if you really do believe that the
age of cheap electronics is about to end, you've just proved
that you've never had a clue about anything at all, ever.
 
S

SMS

Ignoramus18435 said:
Would you recommend a particular commercial vacuum cleaner?

I have a 10 year old Panasonic that I like. I can't comment on the other
commercial vacuums, but I expect that they are equally good.

I've had this Panasonic while my relatives have gone through a
succession of el-junko Eureka and Hoover consumer models.

"http://web1.panasonic.com/food_service/cmo/prod_info/vacuum.html"

The closest is probably the MC-V5210.

Look at the Eureka C5712A from Costco.com.
 
S

SMS

Too_Many_Tools said:
As I said, the disposal is being charged against the consumer at the
end of life of the product...in time the politicians will get it right
and charge for it at the beginning of the product sale.

They are starting to do this in some states. In California, there are
fees for displays. It's working a lot better than trying to charge
people at the time of disposal. You can now dispose of CRTs, LCDs,
Plasma screens, etc., at no charge at time of disposal.

The amount of eWaste is staggering, but we've been externalizing it by
shipping it to third-world countries.

I spent a lot of time on RoHS compliance. At least it was phased in over
several years, so it wasn't as disruptive as many companies claimed that
it would be.
 
S

SMS

SMS said:
What's driving the production of hybrid cars is government policy. Tax
credits, and allowing hybrids to use carpool lanes is a powerful
incentive. Some people buy them because of a belief that they pollute
less, though in reality this is not the case.

I forgot to mention, it's not just government policies that drive hybrid
sales, some employers also give credits to employees. I was wondering
why I saw so many Priuses over by Google in Mountain View, then a friend
that works there told me that Google was giving $5000 to employees that
bought a Prius. I think that it's now $3000, as it proved to be so popular.

There is an article about the public and private promotion of hybrids at
"http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202067,00.html"

Few people would buy hybrids without the perks of single-HOV use, or the
financial credits. The long-term cost of a hybrid is higher than
equivalent non-hybrid vehicles, given the added initial cost, and the
maintenance, though most people don't keep their cars long enough to
have to deal with the big-ticket hybrid maintenance items.

Ironically, the single-HOV use encourages hybrid use on freeways, where
there is no fuel efficiency advantage, plus the HOV lanes are often now
only marginally faster than the non-HOV lanes due to all the single
drivers in the HOV lanes.
 
S

SMS

Mark said:
I recall the 1960's:
- TVs going out until a repairman with a bunch of tubes showed up.

Nah, the drugstores all had self-service tube testers and sold tubes.
You opened your TV, put a little numbered sticker on each tube and on
each socket, and took the tubes down and tested them. They had a little
pamphlet that let you match up the symptom to the proper tube if you
didn't want to take out all the tubes.
- Automobiles needing constant maintenance. (Why was there a "Service
Station" on every corner? Hint: Cars needed *constant* service.)
- 20,000 miles on bias-ply tires was more than you could expect.

This is true. Amusingly, you still have some car owners that believe
that they need to change their oil every 3000 miles, just like back in
the days of non-detergent motor oils.

Don't forget the much more frequent plug replacement, replacing the
distributor cap, rotor, and condenser, and setting the timing and dwell.
"They Don't Build Them Like They Used To -- Thank God!" ;-)

At least for cars and televisions.
 
Nah, the drugstores all had self-service tube testers and sold tubes.
You opened your TV, put a little numbered sticker on each tube and on
each socket, and took the tubes down and tested them. They had a little
pamphlet that let you match up the symptom to the proper tube if you
didn't want to take out all the tubes.


This is true. Amusingly, you still have some car owners that believe
that they need to change their oil every 3000 miles, just like back in
the days of non-detergent motor oils.

Especially since normal city driving is, according to your
owner's manual "extreme service" and they recommend you
change your oil every 3,000 miles. . . .Alan

==

It's not that I think stupidity should be punishable by death.
I just think we should take the warning labels off of everything
and let the problem take care of itself.

--------------------------------------------------------
 
S

SMS

Alan said:
Especially since normal city driving is, according to your
owner's manual "extreme service" and they recommend you
change your oil every 3,000 miles. . . .

First of all, many car makers are using 5000 miles for extreme service,
and 7500 for normal service. Some have service indicators that take into
account actual driving and environmental factors in determining the
proper oil change interval. Often the shorter intervals are to
compensate for poorly designed engines that burn a lot of oil, so the
manufacturer can claim that the vehicle burns no oil between changes.

Second, normal city driving is rarely considered "extreme" service.
Extreme service is more than just stop and go driving, it's all stop and
go driving and short trips, it's driving in extreme heat, or in very
dusty areas. There's a big effort by the oil change industry to convince
owners that almost everyone falls into severe or extreme service. It's
resulted in a lot of "recreational oil changes" that do nothing to
lengthen the service life of the engine.

For Toyota:

* Driving on rough, muddy or snow-melted roads.
* Driving on dusty roads.
* Towing trailers, caravans or boats.
* Repeated short trips (less than 8 km) in freezing conditions.
* Extensive idling and or low speed driving for long distance such as
taxis, couriers, etc.
* Continuous high speed driving (80% or more at maximum vehicle speed)
for over 2 hours.

For Ford
* Towing a trailer or using a camper or car-top carrier
* Extensive idling and/or low-speed driving for long distances as in
heavy commercial use such as delivery, taxi, patrol car or livery
* Operating in dusty conditions such as unpaved or dusty roads
* Off-road operation
* Use of E85 50% of the time or greater (flex fuel vehicles only)
 
C

clare at snyder.on.ca

What's driving the production of hybrid cars is government policy. Tax
credits, and allowing hybrids to use carpool lanes is a powerful
incentive. Some people buy them because of a belief that they pollute
less, though in reality this is not the case.

I don't think that anyone buys a hybrid thinking that they're going to
save money on fuel, versus the extra initial cost, and shorter service life.
In town traffic, a hybrid (toyota or honda design) DO polute less
because they never idle.
 
C

clare at snyder.on.ca

First of all, many car makers are using 5000 miles for extreme service,
and 7500 for normal service. Some have service indicators that take into
account actual driving and environmental factors in determining the
proper oil change interval. Often the shorter intervals are to
compensate for poorly designed engines that burn a lot of oil, so the
manufacturer can claim that the vehicle burns no oil between changes.

Second, normal city driving is rarely considered "extreme" service.
Extreme service is more than just stop and go driving, it's all stop and
go driving and short trips, it's driving in extreme heat, or in very
dusty areas. There's a big effort by the oil change industry to convince
owners that almost everyone falls into severe or extreme service. It's
resulted in a lot of "recreational oil changes" that do nothing to
lengthen the service life of the engine.

For Toyota:

* Driving on rough, muddy or snow-melted roads.
* Driving on dusty roads.
* Towing trailers, caravans or boats.
* Repeated short trips (less than 8 km) in freezing conditions.
* Extensive idling and or low speed driving for long distance such as
taxis, couriers, etc.
* Continuous high speed driving (80% or more at maximum vehicle speed)
for over 2 hours.

For Ford
* Towing a trailer or using a camper or car-top carrier
* Extensive idling and/or low-speed driving for long distances as in
heavy commercial use such as delivery, taxi, patrol car or livery
* Operating in dusty conditions such as unpaved or dusty roads
* Off-road operation
* Use of E85 50% of the time or greater (flex fuel vehicles only)

I consider about 75-80% of in-town driving (and in-region in our area)
to be "severe service".. For my vehicles, and the vast majority of my
customers' vehicles while I was service manager, this was the case.
Trated as such, virtually non of my customers' cars had any problems
that could remotely be attributed to poor lubrication.

Can't say that for all those who argued the point and stuck to the
"normal conditions" schedule. Some got lucky, but certainly not the
majority.
 
R

Rod Speed

clare at snyder.on.ca wrote
I consider about 75-80% of in-town driving (and in-region in our area)
to be "severe service".. For my vehicles, and the vast majority of my
customers' vehicles while I was service manager, this was the case.
Trated as such, virtually non of my customers' cars had any problems
that could remotely be attributed to poor lubrication.

You have no way of quantifying what would have happened
if they hadnt got 'severe service' oil change rates.
Can't say that for all those who argued the point and stuck to the "normal
conditions" schedule. Some got lucky, but certainly not the majority.

Bullshit.
 
J

Jeff, WB8NHV

Rod said:
Rod said:
In my opinon...no.

I dont believe it happens in the sense that its actually possible
to design something to fail early and still have a viable product.

And there is plenty of stuff that clearly aint anything to do
with planned obsolescence at all. Most obviously with stuff
as basic as bread knives which are all metal. Those wont
even need to be replaced when the handle gives out.

And heaps of kitchen stuff is now stainless steel, which
will last forever compared with the older tinplate crap.

I intentionally try to have older appliances, vehicles, machines to
lower repair costs and keep overall ownership cost to a minimum.

Your thoughts?

Works fine with some things, but can bite. I just replaced
the switch in the vaccuum cleaner which is about 40 years
old. Cost peanuts and was very easy to find a new one.

The big 9¼" hand held circular saw that I built the house with
35 years ago has just seen the power switch fail and that is
no longer available from the manufacturer. Fortunately its
failed on so the saw is still usable tho more dangerous.
It uses blades with a 1?" hole. The current blades have
1" holes with washers which allow smaller shafts but no
easy way to use them on my old saw. There doesnt appear
to be any readily available source of different collets for that.

Just had the chain adjuster failed on a dirt cheap relatively
new electric chainsaw. I assumed that they wouldnt bother
to supply parts like that, but I was wrong, readily available
and in fact free. Clearly no planned obsolescence there.

And power tools are now so cheap that they are very viable
to buy even for just one job. I had to cut a copper pipe thats
buried in the ground and it costs peanuts to buy a very decent
jigsaw to cut it, just to avoid having to dig a bigger hole around
where I needed to cut it. Its been fine for other stuff since,
no evidence that its going to die any time soon. Could well get
40 years out of that too like I did with most of the power tools
that I used to build the house.

Cars in spades. I've just replaced my 35 year old car that I was
too stupid to fix the windscreen leak with which eventually produced
rust holes in the floor which wont pass our registration check.
While its possible to plate the holes, I cant be bothered, I intended
to drive that car into the ground and decided that that had happened.
No evidence that the replacement new car wont last as long. Its
certainly got more plastic, most obviously with the bumper bars that
the new one doesnt have, but that mostly due to modern crumple
zones, not due to planned obsolescence and might save my life etc.

People were raving on about planned obsolescence when
I built the house and I've had very little that has ever needed
replacement apart from basic stuff like light bulbs and the
occassional failure of stuff like elements in the oven etc.

More below.

Irreparable damage
By Bryce Baschuk
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
January 9, 2007

Bill Jones, after 42 years, is finally closing the
Procter Appliance Service shop in Silver Spring.

That isnt planned obsolescence, thats the fact that its a
lot cheaper to pay a very low wage asian to make you
a new one than it ever is to pay a first world monkey to
repair your existing one with all but quite trivial faults.

"You can't make a good salary to survive on the way you
could years ago," said the 61-year-old owner of the oven,
refrigerator and washer-dryer repair shop. "Everything
has changed in the appliance business."

It has indeed, but not because of planned obsolescence.

Mr. Jones recently sold his home in Laurel and is in the
process of moving to Bluffton, S.C., with his wife, Jeannette.

Sob sob.

Mr. Jones is one of the many Washington-area repairmen who have
struggled to stay afloat as residents replace, not repair, old
appliances.

Because its generally better value to replace.

"It's a dying trade," said Scott Brown, Webmaster of
www.fixitnow.com
and self-proclaimed "Samurai Appliance Repairman."

Wota fucking wanker. Bet he doesnt disembowel himself when he fucks
up.

The reason for this is twofold, Mr. Brown said: The cost
of appliances is coming down because of cheap overseas
labor and improved manufacturing techniques,

So much for your silly line about planned obsolescence.

and repairmen are literally dying off.

They arent in other industrys that are still viable,
most obviously with cars and trucks and houses.

The average age of appliance technicians is 42, and there are few
young repairmen to take their place, said Mr. Brown, 47. He has
been repairing appliances in New Hampshire for the past 13 years.

He should have had a clue 13 years ago.
The writing was on the wall long before that.

In the next seven years, the number of veteran appliance
repairmen will decrease nationwide as current workers retire
or transfer to other occupations, the Department of Labor
said in its 2007 Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Must be rocket scientist shinybums.

The federal agency said many prospective repairmen prefer work
that is less strenuous and want more comfortable working conditions.

They actually prefer a decent income.

That claimed 'prefer work that is less strenuous and want more
comfortable working conditions' clearly hasnt affect car, truck or
house repair and the construction industry etc. Tho there will
always be some of that with a 5% unemployment rate.

Local repairmen said it is simply a question of economics.
"Nowadays appliances are cheap, so people are just getting new
ones,"

Yep, only a fool wouldnt if the new one costs about
the same as the cost of repairing the old one.

said Paul Singh, a manager at the Appliance Service Depot, a repair
shop in Northwest. "As a result, business has slowed down a lot."

"The average repair cost for a household appliance is $50 to
$350," said Shahid Rana, a service technician at Rana
Refrigeration, a repair shop in Capitol Heights. "If the repair is
going to cost more than
that, we usually tell the customer to go out and buy a new one."

Must be rocket scientist apes.

It's not uncommon for today's repairmen to condemn an appliance
instead of fixing it for the sake of their customers' wallets.

If they decide to repair an appliance that is likely to break
down again, repairmen are criticized by their customers
and often lose business because of a damaged reputation.

Mr. Jones said he based his repair decisions on the 50 percent
rule: "If the cost of service costs more than 50 percent of the
price
of a new machine, I'll tell my customers to get a new one."

What makes a lot more sense is to factor in the failure rate of that
appliance.

"A lot of customers want me to be honest with them, so I'll tell
them
my opinion and leave the decision making up to them," he said.

In recent years, consumers have tended to buy new
appliances when existing warranties expire rather than
repair old appliances, the Department of Labor said.

Hardly surprising given that they are now so cheap.

Mr. Brown acknowledged this trend. "Lower-end appliances which you
can buy for $200 to $300 are basically throwaway appliances," he
said. "They are so inexpensive that you shouldn't pay to get them
repaired." "The quality of the materials that are being made
aren't lasting,"

Pig ignorant silly stuff.

Mr. Jones said. "Nowadays you're seeing more plastic

I had some reservations about my 35 year old
dishwasher that does have a plastic liner. Its lasted fine.

and more circuit boards, and they aren't holding up."

Bullshit.

Many home appliances sold in the United States
are made in Taiwan, Singapore, China and Mexico.

And now china.

"Nothing is made [in the United States] anymore," Mr. Jones said.
"But then again, American parts are only better to a point,
a lot of U.S. companies are all about the dollar."

Fortunately for the next generation of repairmen, some of today's
high-end appliances make service repairs the most cost-effective
option.

The Department of Labor concurred. "Over the next decade, as more
consumers purchase higher-priced appliances designed to have much
longer lives, they will be more likely to use repair services than
to purchase new appliances," said the 2007 Occupational Outlook
Handbook.

Bet that will have **** all effect on the employment prospects.

Modern, energy-efficient refrigerators
can cost as much as $5,000 to $10,000,

Pig ignorant drivel. You can buy plenty of modern energy efficient
fridges for a hell of a lot less than that. I've done just that a
month ago.

and with such a hefty price tag, throwing one away is not an option.

Bet the fools stupid enough to buy those will anyway.

In some cases, repairmen can help consumers reduce the
amount of aggravation that a broken appliance will cause.

Consider the time and effort it takes to shop for a new appliance,
wait for its delivery, remove the old one and get the new one
installed.

I did mine in 30 mins total, literally.

In addition, certain appliances such as ovens and
washing machines can be a bigger hassle to replace
because they are connected to gas and water lines.

Just changed washing machines over too, with a free
one I inherited. Changing the water over took minutes too.

"It takes your time, it takes your effort, and if you don't
install the new appliance, you'll have to hire a service
technician to install it anyways," Mr. Brown said.

Only the incompetant fools that cant change the washing machine over.

Some consumers bond with their appliances like old pets,
and for loyalty or sentimental reasons, refuse to let them go.

Mr. Rana said some of his clients have appliances that are
more than 30 years old. It makes sense, he said. "A lot of old
refrigerators are worth fixing because they give people good
service.

Wrong, those are normally lousy energy efficiency.

They just don't make things like they used to."

Yeah, they make them much better today energy efficiency wise.

And much better design wise too with the shelves and bins etc too.
did you know theres all qualitys of stainless, some will last literaLLYFOREVER

Yep, and all of my kitchen stainless will do that fine.
not so for kitchen stainless,
Wrong.

try a magnet on stainless the better quality is non magnetic

The magnetic stuff will last fine too with that use.

I have an Aiwa bookshelf stereo system which I bought new seven
years ago. One of the cassette decks developed a problem recently, so I
took it to a local repair shop. Left it there over a weekend, then went
back today to pick it up--unrepaired. One of the technicians told me I
had made a wise decision not to have it repaired because the thing is
so old (he also cited NLA--no longer available--parts for the cassette
deck and other parts of the system). I figured this way. I have most of
my CDs stored on my computer, which is hooked up to the stereo (sounds
much better than the stock speakers), and use Winamp (v5.32) to listen
to them. All I'm really using the stereo for now is as an amplifier, so
why should I spend more money than the system is probably worth to have
the cassette decks repaired? As it is, one deck will work but sometimes
jams; I can clear the problem in seconds--the thing works perfectly
once started. (I can always connect a Panasonic boombox with cassette
deck into my system if the one remaining deck quits altogether, so I'm
not concerned about it in the least.) The CD player still works great,
as does the AM/FM digital tuner. As long as the amplifiers work, I
won't put any more money into the system. Even if the amps do go
belly-up eventually, by that time the entire stereo will probably be so
old it won't be worth fixing, period. Then and only then will I
consider getting a new one. I've looked at some of the newest USB
stereos from Aiwa on their website (model BMZ-K1/BMZ-K2), and these
don't even have one cassette deck, let alone two. I think Aiwa, at
least, is realizing that cassettes are all but obsolete. Just watch.
Some day Aiwa, and every other manufacturer of compact audio systems,
will design their very newest systems to download mp3 files from the
Internet exclusively, perhaps with no CD players at all (the BMZ-K1/K2
systems have slot-in 5-CD changers). The BMZ-K1/K2 systems, with USB
ports, are the new generation of compact digital audio systems which
have no cassette decks--and the new ones are getting more sophisticated
all the time. (Other manufacturers are sure to follow suit shortly if
they haven't done so by now.) These -will- render today's digital and
analog bookshelf systems obsolete in no time, if they haven't already.
 
M

Madness

Chuckle. I'm still using my 1988 or so Northgate (back when they were an
actual company, not a Pacific rim brand name) Omnikey keyboard. Yeah, it
cost me over a hundred bucks back then, but it has paid for itself several
times over. (I'm on like my 5th or 6th PC since then, of course.)When the
real Northgate went belly up, I understand somebody else bought the keyboard
line, and was selling them under another brand for awhile. No idea if they
still exist. I also have a crate of Zenith z248 keyboard, which use the same
mechanical Alps key mechanisms. (From when Zenith was still a real company,
of course.)

Luddite and proud of it.

aem sends....
Hey, I still have an IBM Model "M" 101 "clicky" from the original PS/2
line. Has some weight to it and won't slide around while typing (which
the main thing I hate about those modern "cheapies"). Also, a Microsoft
optical mouse which is about 8 or 9 years old and still going strong.
 
R

Rod Speed

Jeff said:
Rod Speed wrote
[email protected] wrote
Rod Speed wrote
In my opinon...no.

I dont believe it happens in the sense that its actually possible
to design something to fail early and still have a viable product.

And there is plenty of stuff that clearly aint anything to do
with planned obsolescence at all. Most obviously with stuff
as basic as bread knives which are all metal. Those wont
even need to be replaced when the handle gives out.

And heaps of kitchen stuff is now stainless steel, which
will last forever compared with the older tinplate crap.

I intentionally try to have older appliances, vehicles, machines
to lower repair costs and keep overall ownership cost to a
minimum.

Your thoughts?

Works fine with some things, but can bite. I just replaced
the switch in the vaccuum cleaner which is about 40 years
old. Cost peanuts and was very easy to find a new one.

The big 9¼" hand held circular saw that I built the house with
35 years ago has just seen the power switch fail and that is
no longer available from the manufacturer. Fortunately its
failed on so the saw is still usable tho more dangerous.
It uses blades with a 1?" hole. The current blades have
1" holes with washers which allow smaller shafts but no
easy way to use them on my old saw. There doesnt appear
to be any readily available source of different collets for that.

Just had the chain adjuster failed on a dirt cheap relatively
new electric chainsaw. I assumed that they wouldnt bother
to supply parts like that, but I was wrong, readily available
and in fact free. Clearly no planned obsolescence there.

And power tools are now so cheap that they are very viable
to buy even for just one job. I had to cut a copper pipe thats
buried in the ground and it costs peanuts to buy a very decent
jigsaw to cut it, just to avoid having to dig a bigger hole around
where I needed to cut it. Its been fine for other stuff since,
no evidence that its going to die any time soon. Could well get
40 years out of that too like I did with most of the power tools
that I used to build the house.

Cars in spades. I've just replaced my 35 year old car that I was
too stupid to fix the windscreen leak with which eventually
produced rust holes in the floor which wont pass our registration
check. While its possible to plate the holes, I cant be bothered,
I intended to drive that car into the ground and decided that that
had happened. No evidence that the replacement new car wont last
as long. Its certainly got more plastic, most obviously with the
bumper bars that the new one doesnt have, but that mostly due to
modern crumple zones, not due to planned obsolescence and might
save my life etc.

People were raving on about planned obsolescence when
I built the house and I've had very little that has ever needed
replacement apart from basic stuff like light bulbs and the
occassional failure of stuff like elements in the oven etc.

More below.

Irreparable damage
By Bryce Baschuk
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
January 9, 2007

Bill Jones, after 42 years, is finally closing the
Procter Appliance Service shop in Silver Spring.

That isnt planned obsolescence, thats the fact that its a
lot cheaper to pay a very low wage asian to make you
a new one than it ever is to pay a first world monkey to
repair your existing one with all but quite trivial faults.

"You can't make a good salary to survive on the way you
could years ago," said the 61-year-old owner of the oven,
refrigerator and washer-dryer repair shop. "Everything
has changed in the appliance business."

It has indeed, but not because of planned obsolescence.

Mr. Jones recently sold his home in Laurel and is in the
process of moving to Bluffton, S.C., with his wife, Jeannette.

Sob sob.

Mr. Jones is one of the many Washington-area repairmen who have
struggled to stay afloat as residents replace, not repair, old
appliances.

Because its generally better value to replace.

"It's a dying trade," said Scott Brown, Webmaster of
www.fixitnow.com
and self-proclaimed "Samurai Appliance Repairman."

Wota fucking wanker. Bet he doesnt disembowel himself when he fucks
up.

The reason for this is twofold, Mr. Brown said: The cost
of appliances is coming down because of cheap overseas
labor and improved manufacturing techniques,

So much for your silly line about planned obsolescence.

and repairmen are literally dying off.

They arent in other industrys that are still viable,
most obviously with cars and trucks and houses.

The average age of appliance technicians is 42, and there are few
young repairmen to take their place, said Mr. Brown, 47. He has
been repairing appliances in New Hampshire for the past 13 years.

He should have had a clue 13 years ago.
The writing was on the wall long before that.

In the next seven years, the number of veteran appliance
repairmen will decrease nationwide as current workers retire
or transfer to other occupations, the Department of Labor
said in its 2007 Occupational Outlook Handbook.

Must be rocket scientist shinybums.

The federal agency said many prospective repairmen prefer work
that is less strenuous and want more comfortable working
conditions.

They actually prefer a decent income.

That claimed 'prefer work that is less strenuous and want more
comfortable working conditions' clearly hasnt affect car, truck or
house repair and the construction industry etc. Tho there will
always be some of that with a 5% unemployment rate.

Local repairmen said it is simply a question of economics.
"Nowadays appliances are cheap, so people are just getting new
ones,"

Yep, only a fool wouldnt if the new one costs about
the same as the cost of repairing the old one.

said Paul Singh, a manager at the Appliance Service Depot, a
repair shop in Northwest. "As a result, business has slowed down
a lot."

"The average repair cost for a household appliance is $50 to
$350," said Shahid Rana, a service technician at Rana
Refrigeration, a repair shop in Capitol Heights. "If the repair is
going to cost more than
that, we usually tell the customer to go out and buy a new one."

Must be rocket scientist apes.

It's not uncommon for today's repairmen to condemn an appliance
instead of fixing it for the sake of their customers' wallets.

If they decide to repair an appliance that is likely to break
down again, repairmen are criticized by their customers
and often lose business because of a damaged reputation.

Mr. Jones said he based his repair decisions on the 50 percent
rule: "If the cost of service costs more than 50 percent of the
price
of a new machine, I'll tell my customers to get a new one."

What makes a lot more sense is to factor in the failure rate of
that appliance.

"A lot of customers want me to be honest with them, so I'll tell
them
my opinion and leave the decision making up to them," he said.

In recent years, consumers have tended to buy new
appliances when existing warranties expire rather than
repair old appliances, the Department of Labor said.

Hardly surprising given that they are now so cheap.

Mr. Brown acknowledged this trend. "Lower-end appliances which you
can buy for $200 to $300 are basically throwaway appliances," he
said. "They are so inexpensive that you shouldn't pay to get them
repaired." "The quality of the materials that are being made
aren't lasting,"

Pig ignorant silly stuff.

Mr. Jones said. "Nowadays you're seeing more plastic

I had some reservations about my 35 year old
dishwasher that does have a plastic liner. Its lasted fine.

and more circuit boards, and they aren't holding up."

Bullshit.

Many home appliances sold in the United States
are made in Taiwan, Singapore, China and Mexico.

And now china.

"Nothing is made [in the United States] anymore," Mr. Jones said.
"But then again, American parts are only better to a point,
a lot of U.S. companies are all about the dollar."

Fortunately for the next generation of repairmen, some of today's
high-end appliances make service repairs the most cost-effective
option.

The Department of Labor concurred. "Over the next decade, as more
consumers purchase higher-priced appliances designed to have much
longer lives, they will be more likely to use repair services than
to purchase new appliances," said the 2007 Occupational Outlook
Handbook.

Bet that will have **** all effect on the employment prospects.

Modern, energy-efficient refrigerators
can cost as much as $5,000 to $10,000,

Pig ignorant drivel. You can buy plenty of modern energy efficient
fridges for a hell of a lot less than that. I've done just that a
month ago.

and with such a hefty price tag, throwing one away is not an
option.

Bet the fools stupid enough to buy those will anyway.

In some cases, repairmen can help consumers reduce the
amount of aggravation that a broken appliance will cause.

Consider the time and effort it takes to shop for a new appliance,
wait for its delivery, remove the old one and get the new one
installed.

I did mine in 30 mins total, literally.

In addition, certain appliances such as ovens and
washing machines can be a bigger hassle to replace
because they are connected to gas and water lines.

Just changed washing machines over too, with a free
one I inherited. Changing the water over took minutes too.

"It takes your time, it takes your effort, and if you don't
install the new appliance, you'll have to hire a service
technician to install it anyways," Mr. Brown said.

Only the incompetant fools that cant change the washing machine
over.

Some consumers bond with their appliances like old pets,
and for loyalty or sentimental reasons, refuse to let them go.

Mr. Rana said some of his clients have appliances that are
more than 30 years old. It makes sense, he said. "A lot of old
refrigerators are worth fixing because they give people good
service.

Wrong, those are normally lousy energy efficiency.

They just don't make things like they used to."

Yeah, they make them much better today energy efficiency wise.

And much better design wise too with the shelves and bins etc too.
did you know theres all qualitys of stainless, some will last
literaLLY FOREVER

Yep, and all of my kitchen stainless will do that fine.
not so for kitchen stainless,
Wrong.

try a magnet on stainless the better quality is non magnetic

The magnetic stuff will last fine too with that use.
I have an Aiwa bookshelf stereo system which I bought new seven
years ago. One of the cassette decks developed a problem recently,
so I took it to a local repair shop. Left it there over a weekend, then
went back today to pick it up--unrepaired. One of the technicians told
me I had made a wise decision not to have it repaired because the
thing is so old (he also cited NLA--no longer available--parts for the
cassette deck and other parts of the system). I figured this way.
I have most of my CDs stored on my computer, which is hooked up
to the stereo (sounds much better than the stock speakers), and use
Winamp (v5.32) to listen to them. All I'm really using the stereo for
now is as an amplifier,

Yeah, I do too.
so why should I spend more money than the system is probably
worth to have the cassette decks repaired? As it is, one deck
will work but sometimes jams; I can clear the problem in seconds
--the thing works perfectly once started.

I gave up on cassettes decades ago, basically when CDs showed up.
(I can always connect a Panasonic boombox with cassette deck
into my system if the one remaining deck quits altogether, so I'm
not concerned about it in the least.) The CD player still works great,

I gave up on that too, prefer mp3s now.
as does the AM/FM digital tuner.

Havent bothered with that in decades either.
As long as the amplifiers work, I won't put any more money into the
system. Even if the amps do go belly-up eventually, by that time the
entire stereo will probably be so old it won't be worth fixing, period.

Yeah, I blew the shit out of the speakers a decade or more
ago and havent bothered to replace just the speakers yet.
Then and only then will I consider getting a new one.
I've looked at some of the newest USB stereos from
Aiwa on their website (model BMZ-K1/BMZ-K2), and
these don't even have one cassette deck, let alone two.

Cassette decks are WAY past their useby date.

The world's moved on forever.
I think Aiwa, at least, is realizing that cassettes are all but obsolete.

So is everyone else.
Just watch. Some day Aiwa, and every other manufacturer of compact
audio systems, will design their very newest systems to download mp3
files from the Internet exclusively, perhaps with no CD players at all

Likely, but not necessary from the net, there'll still be local storage.

Even ipods do it that way.
(the BMZ-K1/K2 systems have slot-in 5-CD changers).
The BMZ-K1/K2 systems, with USB ports, are the new
generation of compact digital audio systems which have
no cassette decks--and the new ones are getting more
sophisticated all the time.

Yep, in spades with ipods etc.
(Other manufacturers are sure to follow
suit shortly if they haven't done so by now.)

Been around for a long time now, most obviously with ipods etc.
These -will- render today's digital and analog bookshelf
systems obsolete in no time, if they haven't already.

They have already, most obviously with ipods and media players.
 
A

Alex

Would you recommend a particular commercial vacuum cleaner?

He sold me a simple upright Panasonic with no extra bells and whistles but and
was not a commercial model. He said I can expect 10 years of service from this one.
 
L

Leonard Caillouet

Too_Many_Tools said:
And with it is the age of artificially cheap electronics...

Hmm, I thought they were genuinely cheap...LOL.

Please pay attention to your posting style. I don't care whether you top
post, bottom post or embed posts, but you could trim to make them easier to
read. Trying to dig out a few lines from several pages of drivell makes it
very hard to follow a thread. Also, the cross posting is likely not
necessary. If you read all of those groups and a comment make sense in the
context of the discussion in that group, then fine. It is rarely necessary
to contimue cross posting and rare that a comment make sense in all of the
groups at the same time, however.

Leonard
 
L

Leonard Caillouet

Edwin Pawlowski said:
There is a plant being built in Florida just to recycle electronic parts.
It is becoming profitable on some level. There is certainly enough "raw
material" to be had.

Where is this plant, who runs it, has it been completed or is it being
built, and what does "profitable on some level" actually mean? Recycling
has been pursued at many levels for some time, but I am curious to know if
someone is actually making a profit at it and what level of recycling is
going on. What are the byproducts and environmental costs of the recycling?
The idea of recycling is a good thing, but the reality of it is that it is
very difficult to make it work in a profitable and environmentally friendly
manner in many cases. Can we have some more info or did you just get a
whiff of something?

Leonard
 
Top