Ahhh, no. I'm only interesting in things that work and are practical. This
was a stunt that anyone could do - hooking a 12 volt inverter to his car's
electrical system and letting it idle. In typical narcissistic prius owner
fashion, this guy hands out a press release and turns the stunt into a news
event.
Here are some messy details. The Prius battery (my info is for the 2004 model
year) is a 202 volt nominal, 6.5 amp-hour (no, I didn't slip a decimal point)
pack that contains (to 100% DOD) 1.3kWh of energy. A pair of golf cart
batteries has 2.64 kWh as a comparison. Toyota limits the cycling to
somewhere between 40 and 80% DOD to extend battery life and thus make a
car-grade warranty possible. Bottom line: The battery is more of a flywheel,
absorbing energy during braking and giving it up during acceleration, than it
is a source of significant energy. A Prius starting battery stores about as
much energy as the high voltage pack. Later model Prii (priuses?) have
slightly larger packs but not enough larger to make much difference.
A MH-style electrical system with a large converter that can fast-charge the
pack is much more fuel-efficient. I have such a system in my cabin, only with
12 12 volt batteries, arranged as a 24 volt S/P bank instead of only a couple.
I know of at least one engineer who has designed an inverter to run directly
from the high voltage bus. He ain't this guy. That would be more efficient
than what this clown did. The clown's architecture is thus
engine->high voltage alternator->rectifier->high voltage pack->12 volt DC/DC
converter->12 volt battery->12 to 120 volt inverter.
Grossly inefficient. According to testing that I've read about, a compact car
idling with the alternator nearly fully loaded by an inverter is more
efficient than this lashup.
A high voltage inverter architecture would be thus:
engine->high voltage alternator->rectifier->high voltage pack->120 vac
inverter.
This would be significantly more efficient than the above lash-up, especially
if the powertrain management computer had a mode programmed in for that type
of operation. It doesn't. Toyota has been playing around with this notion
but so far, nothing. The NiMH batteries that they chose to use are probably
too fragile for that kind of duty.
Bottom line: This clown did nothing any different than any of the rest of us
do when we hook an inverter to the car's battery and idle the engine for
emergency or remote power.
Much more fuel efficient are those who siphon fuel from their vehicles to run
their appropriately sized (yep, even EUs count here) generators. A little 1
or 2 kW generator running just the lights, computer and TV, and maybe the
furnace blower if the furnace is gas powered, is FAR more efficient than
idling a car engine.
Even more efficient than that is my setup, with a high powered UPS that can
run my cabin except for the heating appliances, coupled to a high powered
charger that fully loads a generator. I can operate for days on my battery
bank. I can also restore a day's worth of energy in just a couple of hours
daily of generator operation.
John
--
John De Armond
See my website for my current email address
http://www.neon-john.com
http://www.johndearmond.com <-- best little blog on the net!
Tellico Plains, Occupied TN
There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance. ~Goethe