J
Jon Slaughter
When are they going to put him out of his misery?
Jim Thompson said:My father, when visiting in Idaho (1956), commented, "I knew God
created a lot of stupid people, but I didn't know he put them all in
one place" ;-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_CraigWho is he ?
Graham
Bob Pownall said:Eeyore wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Craig
The short story is he's a Republican U.S. Senator from Idaho. Last
year, he was busted for homosexual lewd conduct in an airport restroom,
later bargained down to disorderly conduct.
Bob Pownall
For which he pleaded guilty! Since, he is trying in court to get the guilty
plea reversed. I guess he really didn't mean it.
The irony is that he, like many republicans, is a right wing moralist with
an anti-gay agenda who supports legislation to reduce the rights of
homosexuals, prevent their marriage, keep them out of the military and other
actions against them.
But, he claims he is not a homosexual. There is evidence to the contrary
making him a hypocrite or the worst kind of legislator supporting laws
against what he himself may do.
The hypocrite factor is what made the case sensational. It was all over the
American press for weeks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Craig
The short story is he's a Republican U.S. Senator from Idaho. Last year,
he was busted for homosexual lewd conduct in an airport restroom, later
bargained down to disorderly conduct.
Eeyore said:Who is he ?
[email protected] wrote in 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
[snip]"Bob Pownall" <[email protected]> wrote in message
The hypocrite factor is what made the case sensational. It was all over
the American press for weeks.While I rather not defend Larry Craig, it is questionable that the
stuff he did in the stall was to solicit sex with the guy in the next
stall. Seriously, putting your foot too close to the other stall means
"let's get it on?" Says who? It's not like that that deal regarding
Bob Allen.
It depends upon how it's done. ALso, IIRC it wasnt' just putting his foot
too close to the stall, IIRC said foot extended into the neighboring stall
and tapped the foot of the guy in said stall. That is way more than just "a
wide stance"! Also, signals are signals precisely because they'd be
understood by someone with similar, well, "interests", and not understoodby
those who don't.
Personally, being very protective of my personal space (and, OK, somewhat
paranoid), if someone shoved their foot into *mine* while I was on the pot,
said foot would very likely end up with several broken bones.
Kris Krieger said:[email protected] wrote in [email protected]:
[email protected] wrote in 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
[snip]
The hypocrite factor is what made the case sensational. It was all
ove r
the American press for weeks.
While I rather not defend Larry Craig, it is questionable that the
stuff he did in the stall was to solicit sex with the guy in the next
stall. Seriously, putting your foot too close to the other stall means
"let's get it on?" Says who? It's not like that that deal regarding
Bob Allen.
It depends upon how it's done. ALso, IIRC it wasnt' just putting his f oot
too close to the stall, IIRC said foot extended into the neighboring
stal l
and tapped the foot of the guy in said stall. That is way more than ju st "a
wide stance"! Also, signals are signals precisely because they'd be
understood by someone with similar, well, "interests", and not
understood by
those who don't.
Personally, being very protective of my personal space (and, OK,
somewhat
paranoid), if someone shoved their foot into *mine* while I was on the
po t,
said foot would very likely end up with several broken bones.
Breaking bones is a bit extreme. Maybe you could give that shoe a
special #2 shine er um if you know what I mean.
OK, that *would* be acceptable
Has anyone checked to see how big the stalls are and what kinda "spread" one
would have if on the toilet? maybe it is impractical to take a shit like
that?
Has anyone checked to see how big the stalls are and what kinda "spread"
one
would have if on the toilet? maybe it is impractical to take a shit like
that?
[email protected] wrote in 8g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
It depends upon how it's done. ALso, IIRC it wasnt' just putting his foot
too close to the stall, IIRC said foot extended into the neighboring stall
and tapped the foot of the guy in said stall. That is way more than just "a
wide stance"! Also, signals are signals precisely because they'd be
understood by someone with similar, well, "interests", and not understood by
those who don't.
Personally, being very protective of my personal space (and, OK, somewhat
paranoid), if someone shoved their foot into *mine* while I was on the pot,
said foot would very likely end up with several broken bones.
One of the few advantages of being classed as disabled are the larger
stalls, with the toilet away from dividers. And I always have my cane
to give them an nice limp, if anyone ever tried.
One of the few advantages of being classed as disabled are the larger
stalls, with the toilet away from dividers. And I always have my cane
to give them an nice limp, if anyone ever tried.
Do you think no one else uses those stalls?