Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Labor is back in

R

Rod Speed

B J Foster wrote
regn.pickfod wrote

And it remains to be seen if he can predict any better than that other fool Steve Keen predicted house prices.
Each rate rise adds $50/week to the average mortgage.

Depends on how great the rate rise is, stupid.
These rate rises are due to inflation caused by Rudd and Gillard Labor spending and borrowing massive amounts of
money.

Corse we never ever saw any rate rises under Howard
with the federal govt not borrowing a cent, eh ?
The annualised M3 expansion ballooned from around 11-12% under Howard (already high) to 25% under Rudd. This
ultimately fuels inflation and interest rate rises.

Corse we never ever saw any rate rises under Howard eh ?
The expanding money supply is also a crude form of capital theft.
Only 3 years of 25% expansion and the value of our savings will be halved.

Not if you have even half a clue about where you have those savings invested.
Labor thieves don't even bother using the tax system anymore.

Odd, could have SWORN they attempted to have a mining profits tax.
The $43 *billion* NBN is not only going to cost us $2000 per person but it will hit us through interest rates as well.

Doesnt have to if part of what was raised from the flogging off of Telstra was used to pay for it.
And being a Labor initiative it will take twice as long and cost twice as much.

Bet it doesnt cost anything like that much more.
 
R

Rod Speed

regn.pickfod wrote
Dr Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF" wrote
The stock market went south within minutes

Like hell it did.
and interst rates are going North within months according to ICAP economist Adam Carr.

And it remains to be seen if he does any better than that other fool Steve Keen did on property prices.
 
S

SG1

Rod Speed said:
Doug Jewell wrote


Nar it wasnt meant that way. I just realise that we have had
quite a few pollys die in office, like that fools that shagged
himself to death quite literally or just resign due to ill health etc.

We've seen a few attempted suicides too.

Well Roddles show them how to do it properly, afterall you know
everything......
 
T

terryc

terryc wrote


Not even possible.

I suppose that statement fully demonstrates the limit of your technical
knowledge. A drop of 7(?) metres every 20 metres as opposed of one from
500 to 5,000 every 1,000-10,000 metres. Why not?
Thats there right now.

Sat links? Yes. Affordable =No.
Higher doesnt help.

And Windsor doesnt even want fibre to every rural hamlet, let alone
every farmer anyway.

Really a small national investment to maximise competition in locally
produced food stuffs.
The vast bulk of them already have decent broadband available via NextG
right now.

With this logic, the government could save money on schools, hospital,
roads and an endless number of expenses as they would all be equally
affordable.


The only thing that isnt any good for is avoiding driving to the DVD
rental place because of the volume charges. Its fine for everything else
and can be significantly cheaper than DSL too, essentially because there
isnt a fixed monthly charge if you dont want that.



Thats just plain silly, most obviously with what Gillard did with the
ETS post Copenhagen.

An the poster child steps forward.
Not even possible now that Windsor and Oakshot have sold out.

Example two poster child. May i suggest you use that ample affordable
broadband available to you and listen carefully to the long interviews
they gave.
How odd that we didnt see that result when Mal gave Whitless the bums
rush that way.

NEWS FLASH! Neither are in politics any more. One is in fairy land and
the other is borderline.
 
R

Rod Speed

terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
I suppose that statement fully demonstrates the limit of your technical knowledge.

We'll see...
A drop of 7(?) metres every 20 metres as opposed of one
from 500 to 5,000 every 1,000-10,000 metres. Why not?

Because most farmers dont even have just a 240/415 service, fuckwit.
Sat links? Yes. Affordable =No.

Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have
never ever had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.

They dont cost any more than DSL, fuckwit.
Really a small national investment to maximise competition in locally produced food stuffs.

Its got absolutely NOTHING to do with locally produced food stuffs, fuckwit.
With this logic, the government could save money on schools, hospital, roads
and an endless number of expenses as they would all be equally affordable.

You wouldnt know what logic was if it bit you on your lard arse.

No surprise that you are completely unemployable.
An the poster child steps forward.

You never ever could bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag.
Example two poster child. May i suggest you use that ample affordable
broadband available to you and listen carefully to the long interviews they gave.

They never ever said anything even remotely resembling anything like that.
NEWS FLASH! Neither are in politics any more.
One is in fairy land and the other is borderline.

Irrelevant to what the voters do about that situation, fuckwit.
 
F

F Murtz

Don said:
and for those interested in politics, Labor is back.

Cheers Don...

=================
Till a few gets caught for kiddie fiddling or some such thing, resigns
and its all on again.All the libs have to do is expose someone.
 
T

terryc

Because most farmers dont even have just a 240/415 service, fuckwit.

Err, does that mean, despite my ~1,000 head of stock, the fact that I am
still not classified as a farmer means that I will get the NBN, OR the
fact that I don't have a three phase power supply connected mean that I
will not get the NBN connected?

<crow call, what sort of back up battery and i going to need for the
phone if the whole shebang needs three phase power at the house>
Thanks for that completely superfluous proof that you have never ever
had a fucking clue about anything at all, ever.

They dont cost any more than DSL, fuckwit.
URL?

Its got absolutely NOTHING to do with locally produced food stuffs,
fuckwit.

Umm, IME real farmers do no need to see porn to know how to reproduce
and produce the future population. It is only city folk who need that.

T
 
T

terryc

Till a few gets caught for kiddie fiddling or some such thing, resigns
and its all on again.All the libs have to do is expose someone.

Utegate again?
 
R

Rod Speed

F Murtz wrote
Don McKenzie wrote
Till a few gets caught for kiddie fiddling or some such thing,
resigns and its all on again.All the libs have to do is expose
someone.

Easier said than done.

And Labor has **** all members in the places most of them are now anyway.
 
R

Rod Speed

kreed wrote
I would tend to agree with these 3 points.
It also might not just be the independents that have
trouble funding another election campaign either.

Sure, they clearly are revelling in the power they currently have and
would prefer not to risk losing that power. Its hard to say what the
voters would do in a quick election right now hung parliament wise.
The "dead" thinghy could really throw a spanner in the works.

Yeah, cept that it could just as easily be a coalition corpse.
 
R

Rod Speed

terryc wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Err, does that mean, despite my ~1,000 head of stock, the fact that I
am still not classified as a farmer means that I will get the NBN,

Nope, it means that the NBN cant be done to operations like
that the same way its done in suburban streets, fuckwit.

Hardly any of the phone services are done using overhead wiring to those either.
OR the fact that I don't have a three phase power supply
connected mean that I will not get the NBN connected?

Nope, it means that the NBN cant be done to operations like
that the same way its done in suburban streets, fuckwit.

Hardly any of the phone services are done using overhead wiring to those either.
<crow call, what sort of back up battery and i going to need for the
phone if the whole shebang needs three phase power at the house>

It doesnt, fuckwit.
Umm, IME real farmers do no need to see porn to know
how to reproduce and produce the future population.

Thats not what those who have broadband use it for, fuckwit.
 
S

son of a bitch

son of a bitch wrote


Bet it is.


It will be too late to cancel it then.


Not a chance.

It's never too late to cancel anything.
Previous Projects started by one government are rarely finished
as planed by the Next Government.
It's going to take years to finish this.
And I'd be extreeeemly surprised if this government goes the full
3 years.
 
A

atec77

It's never too late to cancel anything.
Previous Projects started by one government are rarely finished
as planed by the Next Government.
It's going to take years to finish this.
And I'd be extreeeemly surprised if this government goes the full
3 years.
First 1/4 2011 an election I hear is the official unofficial consideration
 
R

Rod Speed

son of a bitch wrote
Rod Speed wrote
It's never too late to cancel anything.

Labor aint actually stupid enough to cancel it now that faces the
possibility of another election any time one of theirs carks it etc with
that being one of their main claims about what they had to offer.
Previous Projects started by one government are rarely finished as planed by the Next Government.

You aint established that there is a next govt any time soon.
It's going to take years to finish this.

Sure, but I bet even the coalition wont actually have the balls
to pull the plug on it once a substantial part of it has been
rolled out, if they ever do get back in power any time soon.

Their only hope on that is another election quick that does see Labor get the bums rush.
And I'd be extreeeemly surprised if this government goes the full 3 years.

Sure, but that doesnt mean that the coalition is guaranteed to win that election.
 
A

atec77

son of a bitch wrote


Labor aint actually stupid enough to cancel it now that faces the
possibility of another election any time one of theirs carks it etc with
that being one of their main claims about what they had to offer.


You aint established that there is a next govt any time soon.
you cant establish there aint
you made the claim you prove it woddles
Sure, but I bet even the coalition wont actually have the balls
to pull the plug on it once a substantial part of it has been
rolled out, if they ever do get back in power any time soon.
they will when the do
Their only hope on that is another election quick that does see Labor get the bums rush.
certain to happen sooner than later , just as certain as you being an
O2 thief
Sure, but that doesnt mean that the coalition is guaranteed to win that election.

worthless rhetoric as usual woddles , could apply to any party and
just you wasting O2 as usual
 
B

B J Foster

Rod said:
B J Foster wrote ....

Corse we never ever saw any rate rises under Howard
with the federal govt not borrowing a cent, eh ?

In any case, Speedy boi, how do Howard's sins justify Rudd/Gillards
spending? Not that it's relevant anyway.
 
T

terryc

First 1/4 2011 an election I hear is the official unofficial
consideration

That is a no brainer call based on the fact that she looses a no
confidence motion when parliament first resumes (Nov).
 
K

keithr

Till a few gets caught for kiddie fiddling or some such thing, resigns
and its all on again.All the libs have to do is expose someone.

Or vice versa - glass houses.
 

Similar threads

Top