Labor is back in

[Dr Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF]

Dr Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF"


The stock market went south within minutes

To be expected. Labour is always bad for business.

and interst rates are going North within months according
to ICAP economist Adam Carr.

http://mozo.com.au/reserve-bank/art...at-4-5-for-fourth-consecutive-month/800055903

Of course. Excessive government spending (a Labour 'initiative') always drives
up inflation and hence interest rates.

--

- KRudd at his finest.

"The Labour Party is corrupt beyond redemption!"
- Labour hasbeen Mark Latham in a moment of honest clarity.

"This is the recession we had to have!"
- Paul Keating explaining why he gave Australia another Labour recession.

"Silly old bugger!"
- Well known ACTU pisspot and sometime Labour prime minister Bob Hawke
responding to a pensioner who dared ask for more.

"By 1990, no child will live in poverty"
- Bob Hawke again, desperate to win another election.

"A billion trees ..."
- Borke, pissed as a newt again.

"Well may we say 'God save the Queen' because nothing will save the governor
general!"
- Egotistical shithead and pompous fuckwit E.G. Whitlam whining about his
appointee for Governor General John Kerr.

"SHUT THE **** UP YOU DUMB ****!"
- FlangesBum on learning the truth about Labour's economic capabilities.

"I don't care what you fuckers think!"
- KRudd the KRude Rat at his finest again.

"We'll just change it all when we get in."
- Garrett the carrott

 

[Rod Speed]

B J Foster wrote

Rod Speed wrote

In any case, Speedy boi, how do Howard's sins justify Rudd/Gillards spending?

Never said it did. I JUST rubbed your stupid pig ignorant nose in the FACT
that we saw a whole series of rate rises under Howard when that particular
govt wasnt borrowing a cent. so your claim at the top about what causes
rate rises has blown up in your face and covered you with black stuff, again.

Not that it's relevant anyway.

Corse its relevant to that stupid pig ignorant claim of yours now right at the top.

 

[Rod Speed]

terryc wrote

atec77 wrote

Wota fucking wanka...

That is a no brainer call based on the fact that she looses
a no confidence motion when parliament first resumes (Nov).

Nope, not when its not in the independant's interests to have an election then.

Windsor has already said that one of the reasons he went for Labor was
because he believed that the coalition was going to go for another election
as soon as it looked like they could win it.

 

[Rod Speed]

keithr wrote

F Murtz wrote

Or vice versa

Nope, if one of the coalition's gets caught doing that, it wouldnt bring down the govt, stupid.

- glass houses.

Brainless stupidity in your case.

 

[Rod Speed]

.
Positions of great power like tend to attract pedos, sociopaths &
sicko's of all types
in much the same way as flies are attracted to a turd.
In many cases these people with dirt on their hands would be preferred
as they are compromised,
can either be allowed access to their perversion with small risk of
prosecution in return for favours, (votes)
or alternately manipulated / blackmailed by those with the big $$.

In many cases, anyone who knew of someone on the other side doing
these sort of things wouldn't be able to say anything,
because it would very likely expose just as many or more on their side
or even themselves.

That last is mad. Doesnt explain how arseholes like Orkopoulos got caught.

 

[will s]

and for those interested in politics, Labor is back.

Cheers Don...

we have enough bad news on the TV without having it rammed down our face
here as well


both parties lost the election and therefore the leaders are both losers but
the biggest losers are us as we have to suffer them


ffs..... surely you can find enough things about computers to post here
without polluting it with politics

 

[Rod Speed]

will s wrote

we have enough bad news on the TV without having it rammed down our face here as well

Its rammed down our throats, or rammed into our face, you illiterate hoon.

both parties lost the election and therefore the leaders are both
losers but the biggest losers are us as we have to suffer them

ffs..... surely you can find enough things about computers to post
here without polluting it with politics

You clearly dont believe that applys to yourself, hypocrite.

 

[son of a bitch]

terryc wrote

Wota fucking wanka...


Nope, not when its not in the independant's interests to have an election then.

Windsor has already said that one of the reasons he went for Labor was
because he believed that the coalition was going to go for another election
as soon as it looked like they could win it.

The only thing certain in Politics, is that nothing is certain.

When is Comes To: putting your John Hancock on a piece of paper to
sign off billions of Bucks, some will undoubtedly change they mind.

 

[terryc]

and Katter has said that he values stability and might just support the
government if needed to provide that. Note, supporting the government in
frivolous non-confidence and supply votes does not amount to carte-
blanche on policies. It just means they can not do a Kevin "Take it or
leave it" Rudd approach and will need to consult first and genuinely
compromise.

The only thing certain in Politics, is that nothing is certain.

When is Comes To: putting your John Hancock on a piece of paper to sign
off billions of Bucks, some will undoubtedly change they mind.

Umm, isn't that also part of the problem for the coalition? They were
percieved as too ready to do that, offer billions of dollars that they
could not show they had or could obtain.

The only billions that has been mentioned was for regional(all country
areas), not just three independents.

 

[terryc]

To be expected. Labour is always bad for business.

Only for businesss run by herd followers.

Of course. Excessive government spending (a Labour 'initiative') always
drives up inflation and hence interest rates.

It is being driven by consumer spending.

 

[Rod Speed]

son of a bitch wrote

Rod Speed wrote

The only thing certain in Politics, is that nothing is certain.

Plenty is ALWAYS certain, even in politics.

We will ALWAYS have another election sometime.

That will ALWAYS produce a change of govt sometime, even if that takes decades.

In the first world, we will NEVER see the govt that loses refuse to leave govt and
just make an obscene gesture at the winner when the result is very unambiguous.

When is Comes To: putting your John Hancock on a piece of paper to sign off billions of Bucks, some will undoubtedly
change they mind.

Separate matter entirely to that stupid claim of yours just above.

 

[Rod Speed]

terryc wrote

son of a bitch wrote

and Katter has said that he values stability and might
just support the government if needed to provide that.

Yep, its hardly ever in an independant's interest to have an early
election, because they have much more difficulty funding an election
campaign than candidates from the main partys do, and independants
that have been around for a while have enough of a clue to notice that,
even fools as stupid as that fool Katter.

Note, supporting the government in frivolous non-confidence
and supply votes does not amount to carte- blanche on policies.

Corse it doesnt, particularly with loons with such stupid ideas as Katter has.

It just means they can not do a Kevin "Take it or leave it" Rudd
approach and will need to consult first and genuinely compromise.

And thats what they have clearly been doing when attempting to be the minority govt.

Umm, isn't that also part of the problem for the coalition?
Nope.

They were percieved as too ready to do that, offer billions
of dollars that they could not show they had or could obtain.

I never bought that line. That fool Wilke was never going to go for the
coalition. He was always looking for any excuse to go with Labor instead.

The only billions that has been mentioned was for
regional(all country areas), not just three independents.

But was TEN times the billion Wilke made such a fool of himself about.

 

[regn.pickfod]

regn.pickfod wrote


Like hell it did.

To be accurate; when I heard the anouncement I checked my portfolio
and as I follow mostly miners/exploration/resources, they had taken a hit
that nearly brought a tear to the eye.

So it seemed to me that it went south in minutes

And it remains to be seen if he does any better than that other fool
Steve Keen did on property prices.

Employment uptake figures out yesterday doesn't look good for interest
rates.

 

[Rod Speed]

regn.pickfod wrote

Rod Speed wrote

To be accurate; when I heard the anouncement I checked my portfolio and as I follow mostly
miners/exploration/resources, they had taken a hit that nearly brought a tear to the eye.

You're too prone to bursting into tears.

So it seemed to me that it went south in minutes

It didnt.

Employment uptake figures out yesterday doesn't look good for interest rates.

We'll see... There is no automatic relation between employment and interest rates.

 

[will s]

will s wrote


Its rammed down our throats, or rammed into our face, you illiterate hoon.



You clearly dont believe that applys to yourself, hypocrite.

this coming from you just strengthens my point and I know I am absolutely
correct


you are a nasty old person that gets enjoyment from having kids sit on your
lap

 

[Rod Speed]

will s wrote

this coming from you just strengthens my point and I know I am absolutely correct

Thats the completely superfluous proof that you never ever could bullshit and lie your way out of a wet paper bag.

<reams of your puerile shit any 2 year old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs>