It's an ACS sponsored lecture from someone who clearly has the
background to understand the issues. I posted the information in the
hope that someone who believes that "there is sfa beneficial about the
nbn" will attend and demonstrate their superior knowledge.
If anyone can quantify the benefits, he should offer his services to
Conroy who is under siege being challenged by rational people to justify
spending $37b+ of taxpayers money. If Conroy is willing to spend $24m on
a business *plan*, imagine what he'd pay for a business *case*!
And yesterday, I discovered that Roxon is spending $466m on e-Health in
the NEXT TWO YEARS. E-Health is cited ad-nauseum as a reason to have an
NBN but now we are discovering that it is another big black hole into
which Labor pours taxpayers money. If the NBN was so beneficial would it
not make e-Health easier and *cheaper*?
Bottom line:
No-one can justify spending 5-10 times what is needed to build an NBN.
At this point, time would be better spent working out a new plan for 2
years time, when we kick these idiots out.
Everyone knows the benefits of the *internet* in general. Who wants to
listen to a bunch of Labor sycophants dishonestly attributing the
benefits of the *internet* to a misconceived overpriced white elephant?
Organise a debate (not a lecture) on the economic benefits of 100Mbps
versus 12Mbps and it *might* be of some interest.