@kds9591 Well, if it floats your boat, it's worth something to you.
The Huntron does appear to have some utility as an A-B comparison "measurement" between a "known good" production board (a Gold Standard if you will) and a possibly defective board, whether pulled from a current production run or returned for "repair" by a customer. I see no indication that it is capable of determining whether a component is actually performing within its specified tolerance range. In other words, what number can you place on the results presented by the Huntron to compare with the number the Huntron presents for a Gold Standard component? Oh, it doesn't provide any numbers for comparison?
Note, also, that Electronics Point is mainly a hobbyist forum, not a manufacturing discussion group. I maintain that for hobbyist use, the Huntron is a lame and not very precise troubleshooting tool. If I am doing a comparison between a "good" component and an allegedly "bad" component, I would like to know how the two actually differ. I think my hobbyist test equipment dollars are better applied to (1) a good multimeter, (2) a decent oscilloscope, (3) an arbitrary function generator, (4) an accurate LC or LCR meter, plus (as a radio amateur hobbyist) (5) a digital frequency counter, (6) a digital "grid dip" meter, (7) a high-quality vector network analyzer, (8) an RF power meter, (9) an RF generator with calibrated attenuator 50Ω output and perhaps (10) an antenna analyzer (which is a form of one-port VNA).