so I would need to buy a digital or more up to date rf generator to do this?
I wouldn't go that far. This is just a very simple adjustment that requires the ability to set the RF excitation frequency applied to the grid of the previous IF stage very precisely. Not accurately, just precisely, and with some short-term stability while you tweek the core. You just need to match the crystal resonant frequency to the transformer secondary resonant frequency. Failure to do this will broaden the bandwidth of the receiver and pretty much render the crystal filter useless for its intended purpose: narrow the receiver bandwidth to reduce noise and adjacent signals you don't want to hear. This is especially important in the crowded ham bands of today where it seems there is an SSB signal every kilohertz or so. If you are into CW, you can build a simple audio filter to improve CW reception, but that doesn't do much to reduce the noise level. Even a simple one-crystal IF filter is better than none at all to maximize the selectivity of your receiver and reject (attenuate) signals nearby in frequency to the one you are trying to listen to.
If I were doing this, I would probably just cobble together a 450 kHz to 460 kHz sinusoidal signal generator that has about 250 Hz (or better) tuning sensitivity,,, less would be better as you want to "sneak up" on the resonant frequency of the crystal while slowly tuning the transformer to match it and provide the necessary "shoulders" on the bandwidth. That's why the instructions say to "rock" the signal generator while slowly adjusting the core in the secondary of the IF transformer. The rocking action provides a small frequency variation as you tune past the resonance frequency of the crystal, and all turning the slug does is center the bandwidth of the transformer (which is considerably larger than the resonance peak width of the crystal) symmetrically about that peak.
When its done right, you end up with about 2500 Hz bandwidth with the crystal in the circuit, more bandwidth when it is out. Later versions of crystal bandpass filters used multiple crystals to obtain very sharp "skirts" on the bandwidth... some as little at 300 Hz or so for CW reception. Collins went in another direction and used mechanical filters to obtain the same end results, building them so well that they could create SSB signals from DSB modulation by simply filtering out the unwanted sideband. It was much easier to create a DSB signal with a suppressed carrier than to synthesize a SSB signal with a suppressed carrier using quadrature mixing of two quadrature RF and two quadrature audio signals. Today its all done digitally.,, but I digress (as usual).
A ferrite loop stick and a small variable tuning capacitor of maybe 20 to 50 pF would allow you to construct a Hartley oscillator that could tune over 450 kHz to 460 kHz with acceptable tuning resolution. You might have to parallel some fixed mica caps with the variable cap and play with the number of turns on the ferrite core to get the tuning range you need along with the resolution. It would help to also have an inexpensive frequency counter while putting this together and that would also allow you to write down the actual crystal filter resonance frequency when you find it. This will allow you to re-adjust your cobbled together oscillator to
exactly that frequency during subsequent IF alignment steps.
It's been many years since I have farkled around with classic Colpitts, Hartley, and Pierce RF oscillators, but I don't recall that any rocket science is required. Most NPN small-signal transistors will oscillate at a half-megahertz given proper positive feedback. Google some circuits, play around on your bench until something emerges that works "gud enuf" for this one-time alignment job. Need I mention that there is some good information available from the ARRL Handbook (any edition after 1960)? Lots of free information available online if you are an ARRL member.
I see you are a fairly recently licensed amateur radio operator. Do you have an electronics background? Are you comfortable with building prototype circuits, using them as needed, and then abandoning them to go onto something else? I don't wanna disparage it (becuz now I are one), but many new hams are appliance operators. They get their ticket, buy a rig, and get on the air. Nothing wrong with that IMHO. Not everyone has deep pockets so we all get by with what we can. I would have loved to have owned your vintage Hallicrafter when I was getting started in this hobby. I hope you enjoy many hours listening with it after (not if) you get it aligned and purring. Something about the warm glow of vacuum tubes and the smell they emit that brings back fond memories...