Maker Pro
Maker Pro

High efficiency DC motor for a bike?

O

optimistx

Where to find a DC motor with high efficiency for a bike?

How to find (or build?) a bike motor of 250 - 500 W with the 'overall'
efficiency as high as possible, e.g. 97-98 %? ( here overall efficiency =
ratio of power received by the wheel / electric power from the battery
e.g.).

---

When googling many hours I have found:
Aurora solar car has a csiro motor / generator 1.8 kW and claims 98 %
efficiency without bearing and without controller losses:

http://www.tip.csiro.au/Machines/success/sc.html
The pages contain a thorough description of the motor at

http://www.tip.csiro.au/Machines/papers/iwscem/index.html

No gears are needed.

The bike might resemble this solar car, but would be narrower and shorter.


Cyclone bike motor 360W at
http://www.cyclone-tw.com/dc24.htm
boasts the top effiency of 97.6 % (without gears 9.33: 1 , the gear
assumably takes away 10-20 % , 10 % if one stage reduction,20 % if 2 stages
?).



Crystalyte motor specifications for motor 408 at
http://www.crystalyte.com/Mspecs.htm
give output power 344 watts , when input power is 48 V *10 A= 480 W, and
thus efficiency 344 w*100/480 W = 72 % (rpm=383 ). Sounds very low, could
this be easily improved by changed design of the motor?



---

The purpose of this hobby project is to make a power assisted bike for my
own use with these goals:


a) aerodynamic drag coefficient about 0.1 and cross sectional area about 0.1
square meters , excluding wheels and pedals

b) regenerative braking

c) to be used on public cycle paths and public roads in flat terrain in
southern Finland, where hills might be typically 20-40 meters high;
including towns with numerous traffic lights (stop & go)

d) possibility to use solar cells and wind as power source


Ultra capacitors have efficiency of over 99.9 % (e.g. bcap2700 of Maxwell?),
when storing or retrieving energy . If motor / generator can charge / unload
/ utilize them with the efficiency of 98 %, it becomes practical to utilize
downhill and traffic light braking to store energy. The weight and volume
does not seem to be a problem.
Thus one could travel with astonishingly low total power consumption and
high speed. Dreaming around 100-200 W and 50-60 km/h :) (legal restrictions
for bikes and scooters in European Union will be followed of course).

If ultra capacitors can be charged in some seconds from 220V electricity
outlets ( anywhere! ) then even the range would not be a problem.
But if motor / generator efficiency is only eg. 70 % , one gets 0.7 * 0.7 =
49 % of the energy back. If the storage is a battery, then the loss is even
higher, perhaps only 25 % left. Then regenerative braking is useless. But
with ultra capacitors and high efficiency generator / motor the situation
sounds promising.(?).
---

I have studied theoretical physics and mathematics in Helsinki University 40
yrs ago, worked since then with computer programs and simple circuits for
process control etc, but electric motors are new to me. Learning and
tinkering in this hobby project is as important as the possible end result
:)

Could solar car 'Aurora' principles to be copied to a bike? Bying NdFeB
magnets and Litz wire and designing and building the motor on a kitchen
table? If so, which url? ;-)
 
R

Rene Tschaggelar

optimistx said:
Where to find a DC motor with high efficiency for a bike?

How to find (or build?) a bike motor of 250 - 500 W with the 'overall'
efficiency as high as possible, e.g. 97-98 %? ( here overall efficiency =
ratio of power received by the wheel / electric power from the battery
e.g.).

---

When googling many hours I have found:
Aurora solar car has a csiro motor / generator 1.8 kW and claims 98 %
efficiency without bearing and without controller losses:

http://www.tip.csiro.au/Machines/success/sc.html
The pages contain a thorough description of the motor at

http://www.tip.csiro.au/Machines/papers/iwscem/index.html

No gears are needed.

The bike might resemble this solar car, but would be narrower and shorter.


Cyclone bike motor 360W at
http://www.cyclone-tw.com/dc24.htm
boasts the top effiency of 97.6 % (without gears 9.33: 1 , the gear
assumably takes away 10-20 % , 10 % if one stage reduction,20 % if 2 stages
?).



Crystalyte motor specifications for motor 408 at
http://www.crystalyte.com/Mspecs.htm
give output power 344 watts , when input power is 48 V *10 A= 480 W, and
thus efficiency 344 w*100/480 W = 72 % (rpm=383 ). Sounds very low, could
this be easily improved by changed design of the motor?



---

The purpose of this hobby project is to make a power assisted bike for my
own use with these goals:


a) aerodynamic drag coefficient about 0.1 and cross sectional area about 0.1
square meters , excluding wheels and pedals

b) regenerative braking

c) to be used on public cycle paths and public roads in flat terrain in
southern Finland, where hills might be typically 20-40 meters high;
including towns with numerous traffic lights (stop & go)

d) possibility to use solar cells and wind as power source


Ultra capacitors have efficiency of over 99.9 % (e.g. bcap2700 of Maxwell?),
when storing or retrieving energy . If motor / generator can charge / unload
/ utilize them with the efficiency of 98 %, it becomes practical to utilize
downhill and traffic light braking to store energy. The weight and volume
does not seem to be a problem.
Thus one could travel with astonishingly low total power consumption and
high speed. Dreaming around 100-200 W and 50-60 km/h :) (legal restrictions
for bikes and scooters in European Union will be followed of course).

If ultra capacitors can be charged in some seconds from 220V electricity
outlets ( anywhere! ) then even the range would not be a problem.
But if motor / generator efficiency is only eg. 70 % , one gets 0.7 * 0.7 =
49 % of the energy back. If the storage is a battery, then the loss is even
higher, perhaps only 25 % left. Then regenerative braking is useless. But
with ultra capacitors and high efficiency generator / motor the situation
sounds promising.(?).
---

I have studied theoretical physics and mathematics in Helsinki University 40
yrs ago, worked since then with computer programs and simple circuits for
process control etc, but electric motors are new to me. Learning and
tinkering in this hobby project is as important as the possible end result
:)

Could solar car 'Aurora' principles to be copied to a bike? Bying NdFeB
magnets and Litz wire and designing and building the motor on a kitchen
table? If so, which url? ;-)

Theoretical physics ?
It is not all numbers. Plus the number should also make sense.
An aerodynamic drag coefficient of 0.1 is a bit low. A cross
section of 0.1 m^2 is also a bit low, a mere 30cm in square.
As to the motors. Bigger motors have higher efficiencies.

It is rather hard to achieve the 99.9% on ultracaps. The
electronics doesn't run on nothing. Regenerative braking
makes sense when the traffic is stop and go plus in hilly
landscapes.

Plus don't forget the drag of the wheel when the road is
not as smooth as a railway track.

Rene
 
O

optimistx

Rene said:
Theoretical physics ?
It is not all numbers. Plus the number should also make sense.
An aerodynamic drag coefficient of 0.1 is a bit low. A cross
section of 0.1 m^2 is also a bit low, a mere 30cm in square.
As to the motors. Bigger motors have higher efficiencies.

It is rather hard to achieve the 99.9% on ultracaps. The
electronics doesn't run on nothing. Regenerative braking
makes sense when the traffic is stop and go plus in hilly
landscapes.

Plus don't forget the drag of the wheel when the road is
not as smooth as a railway track.

Rene
nice to get your comment, and so soon.

Air drag coefficient, cross sectional areas, and rolling resistance
coefficients are based on asphalt road tests on my real recumbent 2-wheeled
bicycle equipped with a pc to measure parameters, and with a capability to
travel in it feet first with body completely straight in a horizontal
position, 0 degrees. My width is 45 cm and 'thickness' 20 cm, 45 cm * 20 cm
= 0.09 m2. With a suitable hard clothing as fairing I would resemble a seal
and dive through air :) .

Theoretically this has much smaller cross sectional area than world record
bike 'Diablo',

which at 4500 ft altitude with 0.006 slope made 132.3 km/h (with 500 W human
power of Sam Whittingham, assumably)

http://www.legslarry.beerdrinkers.co.uk/tech/AeroDrag.htm

In theoreticl physics I learned about electricity and magnetism, but
professors never mentioned 'electric motor' as far as I can remember :). As
in linear algebra the word 'matrix' was a forbidden word (being too
practical, too much applied science).
 
R

Rene Tschaggelar

optimistx said:
Rene Tschaggelar wrote:



nice to get your comment, and so soon.

Air drag coefficient, cross sectional areas, and rolling resistance
coefficients are based on asphalt road tests on my real recumbent 2-wheeled
bicycle equipped with a pc to measure parameters, and with a capability to
travel in it feet first with body completely straight in a horizontal
position, 0 degrees. My width is 45 cm and 'thickness' 20 cm, 45 cm * 20 cm
= 0.09 m2. With a suitable hard clothing as fairing I would resemble a seal
and dive through air :) .

Theoretically this has much smaller cross sectional area than world record
bike 'Diablo',

which at 4500 ft altitude with 0.006 slope made 132.3 km/h (with 500 W human
power of Sam Whittingham, assumably)

The 500W are not to be made "completely straight". Some muscles have
to be moved and the suboptimal shape lets the drag coefficient quickly
rise above 0.1.

I remember having heard about such a seup with 4 wheels where they
achieved 300km to the liter with a little hydrogen motor.

impressive numbers. I realize the motivation is the numbers,
less whether the whole is useable. It doesn't need australian
outback rough road to increase the drag of the wheel.
Further I'd assume the measured power to be calculated from a
pull-wire. Power is equal pull times speed.
500W mechanical means several kW thermal, which are not doable
flat, feet first, the searing sun overhead, and little convection.
The air drag of 0.1 means little convection, doesn't it ?
In theoreticl physics I learned about electricity and magnetism, but
professors never mentioned 'electric motor' as far as I can remember :). As
in linear algebra the word 'matrix' was a forbidden word (being too
practical, too much applied science).

I'm aware of that.
An additional [set of] engineer(s) might help in effectively
applying the available technology of electronics.

Rene
 
Rene said:
optimistx said:
Rene Tschaggelar wrote:



nice to get your comment, and so soon.

Air drag coefficient, cross sectional areas, and rolling resistance
coefficients are based on asphalt road tests on my real recumbent 2-wheeled
bicycle equipped with a pc to measure parameters, and with a capability to
travel in it feet first with body completely straight in a horizontal
position, 0 degrees. My width is 45 cm and 'thickness' 20 cm, 45 cm * 20 cm
= 0.09 m2. With a suitable hard clothing as fairing I would resemble a seal
and dive through air :) .

Theoretically this has much smaller cross sectional area than world record
bike 'Diablo',

which at 4500 ft altitude with 0.006 slope made 132.3 km/h (with 500 W human
power of Sam Whittingham, assumably)

The 500W are not to be made "completely straight". Some muscles have
to be moved and the suboptimal shape lets the drag coefficient quickly
rise above 0.1.

I remember having heard about such a seup with 4 wheels where they
achieved 300km to the liter with a little hydrogen motor.

impressive numbers. I realize the motivation is the numbers,
less whether the whole is useable. It doesn't need australian
outback rough road to increase the drag of the wheel.
Further I'd assume the measured power to be calculated from a
pull-wire. Power is equal pull times speed.
500W mechanical means several kW thermal, which are not doable
flat, feet first, the searing sun overhead, and little convection.
The air drag of 0.1 means little convection, doesn't it ?
In theoreticl physics I learned about electricity and magnetism, but
professors never mentioned 'electric motor' as far as I can remember :). As
in linear algebra the word 'matrix' was a forbidden word (being too
practical, too much applied science).

I'm aware of that.
An additional [set of] engineer(s) might help in effectively
applying the available technology of electronics.

Rene
The 500W are not to be made "completely straight". Some muscles have
to be moved and the suboptimal shape lets the drag coefficient quickly
rise above 0.1.

I think he was talking about the case when his bike is being powered by
the electric motor.

- Tom
 
R

Rene Tschaggelar

Rene said:
optimistx wrote:

impressive numbers. I realize the motivation is the numbers,
less whether the whole is useable. It doesn't need australian
outback rough road to increase the drag of the wheel.
Further I'd assume the measured power to be calculated from a
pull-wire. Power is equal pull times speed.
500W mechanical means several kW thermal, which are not doable
flat, feet first, the searing sun overhead, and little convection.
The air drag of 0.1 means little convection, doesn't it ?

In theoreticl physics I learned about electricity and magnetism, but
professors never mentioned 'electric motor' as far as I can remember :). As
in linear algebra the word 'matrix' was a forbidden word (being too
practical, too much applied science).

I'm aware of that.
An additional [set of] engineer(s) might help in effectively
applying the available technology of electronics.
The 500W are not to be made "completely straight". Some muscles have
to be moved and the suboptimal shape lets the drag coefficient quickly
rise above 0.1.

I think he was talking about the case when his bike is being powered by
the electric motor.

Yes, that could be so. The term HPV suggested that the
vehicle was thought to be human powered.

Rene
 
O

optimistx

Rene said:
The 500W are not to be made "completely straight". Some muscles have
to be moved and the suboptimal shape lets the drag coefficient quickly
rise above 0.1.
True. During coasting or with motor only legs are kept straight within the
'fairing'.
I remember having heard about such a seup with 4 wheels where they
achieved 300km to the liter with a little hydrogen motor.

In competitions like

http://www.sci.fi/~fmmc/fmmcEng.html

http://www.sci.fi/~fmmc/result06.html

the winner got this year 7759 mpg (miles per gallon), or 2746 km/litre . The
average speed is
low.
An additional [set of] engineer(s) might help in effectively
applying the available technology of electronics.

Yes. A group of volunteers would be ideal, because this is not a commercial
project,
and there are no sponsors.

---

Are there people interested in bike motors like there are lots of
enthusiasts in radio controlled
airplanes, assembling motors like they do in

http://www.powercroco.de

e.g. reducing the rpm and increasing torque with

http://www.aerodesign.de/peter/2001/LRK350/Warum_dreht_er_so_eng.html#Anker1164462
 
Top