Im still trying to grasp my head around battery capacity and technology we use today. However, from what I can see below, something doesnt add up. I probably shouldnt be presuming this; but, I would think that both devices use lithium ion; and, the products are in the smallest possible enclosure they can fit in. However, the size that Product B shows looks a little too big for it's capacity when compared to Product A.
Maybe Product A figured out a way to make their product more space efficient using a more advanced technology? Last year's model for Product A, used to be 11000mAh capacity that fit in the same enclosure; which would better match the specs in Product B.
Product A: New Trent iCarrier 12000mAh battery pack
Dimensions: 2.9 x 2.8 x 1.1 inches, weight unknown
Product B: Anker® Astro3 10000mAh
Dimensions: 4.9 x 2.9 x 0.9 inches ; 9.9 ounces
I'm guessing most people wouldnt really care one way or another, but Im curious what they might have done to in this year's Product A to make it a bit more space efficient.
Maybe Product A figured out a way to make their product more space efficient using a more advanced technology? Last year's model for Product A, used to be 11000mAh capacity that fit in the same enclosure; which would better match the specs in Product B.
Product A: New Trent iCarrier 12000mAh battery pack
Dimensions: 2.9 x 2.8 x 1.1 inches, weight unknown
Product B: Anker® Astro3 10000mAh
Dimensions: 4.9 x 2.9 x 0.9 inches ; 9.9 ounces
I'm guessing most people wouldnt really care one way or another, but Im curious what they might have done to in this year's Product A to make it a bit more space efficient.