France beat US (+) about reliability of wireless alarm systems subject RFI.

[Frank Olson]

Now its to late.

The in france available 2 frequency (434 & 868 MHz) wireless alarm
product is a lot more reliable against RFI and beat definitely and
without any doubt the actual products on the US & UK markets.
This is due to the stupid attitude of "so called" (?) professionals
in this group.

Since 3 years i tell to US & UK persons involved in alarm wireless
systems to ask for manufacturer specifications on the wireless parts
in order to evaluate theyre RFI protection performance.

<snip>

This is the equipment Paul purchased that started him down the road he's set
on following:

http://www.jr-international.fr/modules.php?name=Boutique&itm_ref=1845

In several past posts, Paul has told us that the wireless system he
installed in his house was "unreliable" and easily "muzzled". He's since
stated that he's had the system replaced with a "self-monitored" hard wired
system, and advocates that anyone that owns a wireless alarm panel replace
it as well. We know he's lied. He never replaced the equipment he
purchased, but called in a "low level technician" to fix the system. He
apparently didn't install the transmitters properly and ran into other
problems too complex for him to solve by himself.

Paul knows nothing of professional grade wireless security systems. It's
obvious he doesn't understand what "RFI" is either or how it truly affects
the equipment that's employed on a daily basis world-wide. There hasn't
been a single report of a professionally installed wireless system being
compromised (or "muzzled" to use one of his favourite words).

 

[P A U L]

Now its to late.

The in france available 2 frequency (434 & 868 MHz) wireless alarm
product is a lot more reliable against RFI and beat definitely and
without any doubt the actual products on the US & UK markets.
This is due to the stupid attitude of "so called" (?) professionals
in this group.

Since 3 years i tell to US & UK persons involved in alarm wireless
systems to ask for manufacturer specifications on the wireless parts
in order to evaluate theyre RFI protection performance.
Even the most elementary data is not available, its worse than any
simple equipment on the market.. And alarm systems are supposed to
protect your belongings.. let me laugh.
I mentioned several times to those "low level electricians" to
behaves like a manager, wasted time they are executers and as such
behaves like theyre low education level indicate with brut force
(experience in hammer and cleaning cloth tools), with insults and
similar goodies.
I asked for the manufacturers involvement in the RFI problem from
managers present in this group (if any), I asked them to warn theyre
manufacturers about the problem of RFI, to provide support against
what i say.. nothing came from them.. Secret data, my ass (my ass =
usual expression from pro's).

You lose with your brut war force in other countries not only the
sympathy of the population, you lose in wireless alarm system RFI
avoidance techniques too and that in front of your own people.

Look at http://www.chez.com/montmartre/alarmes-sans-fil.html
theyre dual band (434 & 868 MHz) system, its a lot better than the
junk you sell over there.

Poor losers, go on your way with your wet finger in the wind test
equipment and brut insult force..
You are late on arrival with that low level mentality....

Owners and future owners, its time that the stupidity on so called
professionals come to light in your mind.. Replace your system before
you have problems with you own security.

Paul

 

[me and bobby mcgee]

People have been arguing with this troll named "Paul" for years. Yes, YEARS.

FYI- from now on anyone who argues with Paul gets "plonked". (I guess that
means me too, since I replied to the thread

 

[P A U L]

Now its to late.

The in france available 2 frequency (434 & 868 MHz) wireless alarm
product is a lot more reliable against RFI and beat definitely and
without any doubt the actual products on the US & UK markets.
This is due to the stupid attitude of "so called" (?) professionals
in this group.

Since 3 years i tell to US & UK persons involved in alarm wireless
systems to ask for manufacturer specifications on the wireless parts
in order to evaluate theyre RFI protection performance.
Even the most elementary data is not available, its worse than any
simple equipment on the market.. And alarm systems are supposed to
protect your belongings.. let me laugh.
I mentioned several times to those "low level electricians" to
behaves like a manager, wasted time they are executers and as such
behaves like theyre low education level indicate with brut force
(experience in hammer and cleaning cloth tools), with insults and
similar goodies.
I asked for the manufacturers involvement in the RFI problem from
managers present in this group (if any), I asked them to warn theyre
manufacturers about the problem of RFI, to provide support against
what i say.. nothing came from them.. Secret data, my ass (my ass =
usual expression from pro's).

You lose with your brut war force in other countries not only the
sympathy of the population, you lose in wireless alarm system RFI
avoidance techniques too and that in front of your own people.

Look at http://www.chez.com/montmartre/alarmes-sans-fil.html
theyre dual band (434 & 868 MHz) system, its a lot better than the
junk you sell over there.

Poor losers, go on your way with your wet finger in the wind test
equipment and brut insult force..
You are late on arrival with that low level mentality....

Owners and future owners, its time that the stupidity on so called
professionals come to light in your mind.. Replace your system before
you have problems with you own security.

Paul

It is frustrating to see that US start to lose the market due to
french wireless alarm systems who have a real Radio Frequency
Interferences (RFI) avoidance product.

Finally a better Wireless Alarm system (WAS) Radio Frequency
Interference (RFI) protection quality coming from France..
I have mentioned since more than 3 years the RFI problem in several
NG's from the US, UK and the EC countries, it seems that the message
has been handled with more care in the EC.

Some mentioned in the past that Spread Spectrum (SS) solved the RFI
problem..
Nonsences it's designed for sensor location facility, its only valid
for RFI avoidance who is only valid when the SS frequencies are wide
spread and captured by a receiver tuned constantly and individual to
each frequency. I have mentioned too that it is almost impossibility
to tune the receiver in synchronism to each SS frequency in a
asynchronous burst configuration who render this almost impossible in
a economical way.

In the advertisement from André (see below) you find several systems
and principles:
- conventional and small shifted dual frequency types
(no improvement for RFI);
- a dual very different frequency range type and finally
- a Bi-directional type.

Even with a still limited manufacturer specification its possible to
identify immediately the different systems and principle.

The dual frequency principle used is a sign of the acceptance of my
concerns about RFI.
The first type i like to mention is the 433 & 868MHz type who has two
independent to each frequency tuned receivers. RFI is not avoided but
drastically reduced due the rather impossibility to have both
frequencies interfered simultaneously.

The bi-directional type, not certified yet is certainly the best
upcoming solution to avoid RFI.

//www.chez.com/montmartre/alarmes-sans-fil.html[/URL]
its worth to be taken in consideration.

I hope only one thing, that the manufacturers provide to André a
little more technical specifications on theyre wireless communication
data loop items and then the RFI problem solution of the different
systems can receive a final quality consideration with more
certainties.

Paul

 

[P A U L]

JIM,

What you pretend to be from me is a LIE.. POOR man.

Paul

 

[P A U L]

The french dual band dual frequency wireless alarm system is the best
produced against Radio frequency interference (RFI) till now.

Its to late poor Franky, you "collaborated" with your repeatedly
nonsences to the fact that the US is out of business about reliability
of wireless alarm systems.

You argumentation about my system where previously that it was build
in a undeveloped country (belgium), failed once you know about us and
where we are located (prior to our opposition to US war in.. guess).
... poor man.

Paul

 

[Jackcsg]

This person knows nothing about anything in the security industry, let alone
anything wireless. He fails to understand basic technology used in most
wireless devices. He also thinks the French have just recently invented
wireless technology. He knows nothing about Spread Spectrum Technology and
the use of encrypted signal transmissions Technology. He fails to except the
facts of wireless technology even from Manufacturers.

Jack