I have a Fluke 87 and have been thinking of upgrading to the 189. But I
have been hearing lately from two different people now, that the 189
has an annoying problem. "The range switching is annoying. With varying
signals, the 87 does a good job of quickly jumping ranges. The 189
loses its composure briefly and blanks the display as it jumps around
making following a variable signal annoying unless you manually lock in
a given range" I asked the one individual if maybe he was trying to use
the 189 on a variable frequency drive in which case the 87V would be
more appropriate, and he said that no he was just using it for typical
DMM applications. Anybody else have any gripes with their Fluke 189
DMM? Thank you for any input. B. Taylor
have been hearing lately from two different people now, that the 189
has an annoying problem. "The range switching is annoying. With varying
signals, the 87 does a good job of quickly jumping ranges. The 189
loses its composure briefly and blanks the display as it jumps around
making following a variable signal annoying unless you manually lock in
a given range" I asked the one individual if maybe he was trying to use
the 189 on a variable frequency drive in which case the 87V would be
more appropriate, and he said that no he was just using it for typical
DMM applications. Anybody else have any gripes with their Fluke 189
DMM? Thank you for any input. B. Taylor