Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Energizer ''D'' Batteries.

A

Allodoxaphobia

www.newstarget.com/PhotoTour_Energizer_Batteries_1.html

I never have bought any Energizer batteries before,,, because I don't
like that Energizer Bunny.I always buy Ray O Vac Alkaline Batteries.
www.rayovac.com

I especially like (and agree with):
"Mainstream consumers are remarkably gullible,
and few understand any technical specs at all."

This "AA-stuffed-into-a-D-cylinder" cheat goes way back to the Olde
NiCad days. I've also seen NiCad C cells stuffed into D cylinders, too.

Jonesy
 
J

jakdedert

Allodoxaphobia said:
I especially like (and agree with):
"Mainstream consumers are remarkably gullible,
and few understand any technical specs at all."

This "AA-stuffed-into-a-D-cylinder" cheat goes way back to the Olde
NiCad days. I've also seen NiCad C cells stuffed into D cylinders, too.

Jonesy
I've got a pair (each) of AA -- C, and AA - D adapters. You just slip
the AA into the appropriate adapter...instant C or D cell. Of course,
they only supply AA current and amp-hours, but for some apps they can be
handy. They came with a set of Nimh 's and charger package I bought.

jak
 
K

Ken G.

Those batterys are made in one big place and get different covers put on
them . They are all he same just different grades , they put out voltage
into your ``toys``
 
J

James Sweet

JANA said:
Energizer and Mallory are both very good batteries. There is no big
difference. There are only a few manufactures that make the chemicals that
these batteries are made out of.

Years ago Consumer Reports did a test of many different brands of batteries
and Energizer consistently came out lower, Duracell was one of the better
ones as I recall, but many store brands did as well or nearly so for much
lower cost. There is, or was at the time, a measurable difference and it
matched my personal experience, now that everything is made in China that
may not be true anymore.

That said, I use NiMH rechareables almost exclusively now.
 
W

William Sommerwerck

Years ago Consumer Reports did a test of many different brands of
batteries
and Energizer consistently came out lower, Duracell was one of the better
ones as I recall, but many store brands did as well or nearly so for much
lower cost. There is, or was at the time, a measurable difference and it
matched my personal experience, now that everything is made in China that
may not be true anymore.

Their most-recent tests gave top value to Costco Kirkland, which are
actually Toshiba.

That said, I use NiMH rechareables almost exclusively now.

Great for photoflashes, or any high-drain application. Not so good for
remote controls or low-drain devices.

MAHA makes a great computer-controlled charger-conditioner.
 
C

clifto

James said:
Years ago Consumer Reports did a test of many different brands of batteries
and Energizer consistently came out lower, Duracell was one of the better
ones as I recall, but many store brands did as well or nearly so for much
lower cost.

Every few years I buy a few Duracells, to remind me why I don't buy Duracells.
I have never gotten as long life out of any Duracell as I get out of the
cheapest no-name battery.
 
U

UCLAN

James said:
Years ago Consumer Reports did a test of many different brands of batteries
and Energizer consistently came out lower, Duracell was one of the better
ones as I recall, but many store brands did as well or nearly so for much
lower cost. There is, or was at the time, a measurable difference and it
matched my personal experience, now that everything is made in China that
may not be true anymore.

That said, I use NiMH rechareables almost exclusively now.

Have you tried the new "low discharge" NiMH batteries yet? All the pluses
of NiMH cells, without the problem of rapid self discharge. I've been
running a pair in my cordless mouse for over a month now, and the software
reports they still have a 98% charge. Never got more than a week or two
from the old style NiMH cells. Only downside is that the maximum capacity
is 2100 mAh for now.
 
U

UCLAN

William said:
Great for photoflashes, or any high-drain application. Not so good for
remote controls or low-drain devices.

The new "low discharge" NiMH cells will change your mind about that.
MAHA makes a great computer-controlled charger-conditioner.

Love my MH-C401FS. It's been a workhorse for over a year...closer to two.
 
J

James Sweet

Have you tried the new "low discharge" NiMH batteries yet? All the pluses
of NiMH cells, without the problem of rapid self discharge. I've been
running a pair in my cordless mouse for over a month now, and the software
reports they still have a 98% charge. Never got more than a week or two
from the old style NiMH cells. Only downside is that the maximum capacity
is 2100 mAh for now.

I haven't, I should pick some up for the flashlights though, the clocks and
receiver remote can stick with alkalines, I'd get carbon zincs for those if
I could find them anymore, they don't tend to leak.

I finally modified all my digital clocks with 9V batteries to use NiCds and
charge them, all it takes is adding a resistor across the isolation diode.
Those stupid things were dead every time I needed them until I did that. I
added a warning label to the back just in case they end up in someone else's
hands.
 
R

Ron(UK)

clifto said:
Every few years I buy a few Duracells, to remind me why I don't buy Duracells.
I have never gotten as long life out of any Duracell as I get out of the
cheapest no-name battery.

You must be buying chinese knockoffs!

I`ve seen what look exactly like Duracell goldtop PP3`s which on
dismantling are stack of flat cells and not made up of cylindrical cells
as in a real duracell.

I use a lot of PP3 and AA cells for radio microphone work, and Procells
outlast all other makes with the possible exception of Varta Industrial
(Blue) PP3`s which are much cheaper and last last just as long as a
Duracell PP3.
The downside is that I`ve had a few early failures with Vartas

Ron(UK)
 
U

UCLAN

James said:
I haven't, I should pick some up for the flashlights though,

I have a small LED flashlight that uses two AA batteries. My Kodak 2100 mAh
low discharge NiMH cells last longer than Duracell or Energizer AA cells.
They charge fine in my MH-C401FS as well.
 
C

clifto

Ron(UK) said:
You must be buying chinese knockoffs!

Nope. This ranges as far back as I can recall Duracell being around, long
before Chinese knockoffs were widespread.
I`ve seen what look exactly like Duracell goldtop PP3`s which on
dismantling are stack of flat cells and not made up of cylindrical cells
as in a real duracell.

I have, too. But the brand name is different enough that it catches my
attention.

One typical incident I remember was in the very early eighties, when we
were on a little outing about 50 miles from home. I forgot batteries for
my boom box, which we were depending on for picnic music, so when we all
stopped at a hardware store out that way, I picked up the only D cells
they had, Duracells. The boom box would reliably run for four hours at
high volume on eight D cells from Eveready or RayOVac, and I could get
two hours out of it on cheapo batteries like Walgreen's house brand or
that ilk. The Duracells lasted almost a whole hour.
 
R

Ron(UK)

clifto said:
Ron(UK) wrote:

I have, too. But the brand name is different enough that it catches my
attention.

I`ve seen Duracell ripoffs that are absolutely indistinguishable from
the real thing until you take them apart. They even come in packaging
that`s exactly like the real thing! If there`s one thing the Chinese are
good at it`s cosmetic copying.
One typical incident I remember was in the very early eighties, when we
were on a little outing about 50 miles from home. I forgot batteries for
my boom box, which we were depending on for picnic music, so when we all
stopped at a hardware store out that way, I picked up the only D cells
they had, Duracells. The boom box would reliably run for four hours at
high volume on eight D cells from Eveready or RayOVac, and I could get
two hours out of it on cheapo batteries like Walgreen's house brand or
that ilk. The Duracells lasted almost a whole hour.

I`m not doubting you, and I have little experience with Duracell D
cells, but you never know how long those Duracells have been sitting on
a shelf and in what conditions they were stored. Don't get me wrong, I`m
not championing Duracell for any other reason than that they serve us
well when used in radio microphones, where a failure can be very very
embarrassing.
Some wireless kit is very fussy about what you feed it. Our Sennheiser
mikes for example refuse to work for more than a few minutes on brand
new Panasonic heavy duty PP3`s but run for at least eight hours on a
single Procell. That might be an impedance thing, I don't know.

When I was a kid, maybe 9 or 10, my dad bought me a Heathkit Jr
electronics workshop for Christmas, Included in the box were four C
sized red and yellow RayOVac cells. Here in England, I'd never seen that
make of batteries before, and those four cells lasted for years,
whatever they made them from, they should reintroduce it!

Ron(UK)
 
J

Jamie

Ron(UK) said:
I`ve seen Duracell ripoffs that are absolutely indistinguishable from
the real thing until you take them apart. They even come in packaging
that`s exactly like the real thing! If there`s one thing the Chinese are
good at it`s cosmetic copying.



I`m not doubting you, and I have little experience with Duracell D
cells, but you never know how long those Duracells have been sitting on
a shelf and in what conditions they were stored. Don't get me wrong, I`m
not championing Duracell for any other reason than that they serve us
well when used in radio microphones, where a failure can be very very
embarrassing.
Some wireless kit is very fussy about what you feed it. Our Sennheiser
mikes for example refuse to work for more than a few minutes on brand
new Panasonic heavy duty PP3`s but run for at least eight hours on a
single Procell. That might be an impedance thing, I don't know.

When I was a kid, maybe 9 or 10, my dad bought me a Heathkit Jr
electronics workshop for Christmas, Included in the box were four C
sized red and yellow RayOVac cells. Here in England, I'd never seen that
make of batteries before, and those four cells lasted for years,
whatever they made them from, they should reintroduce it!

Ron(UK)
I remember when I grabbed what I thought was a great deal, a brick of
AA's copper tops.
I didn't look close enough..,
it's amazing how the eye can get fooled while not thinking of getting
a screwing..
They turned out to be Duraking not Duracell.
They were no more than carbon cells at best in a cardboard tube that
didn't last long at all.
 
J

Jeff Liebermann

Allodoxaphobia said:
I especially like (and agree with):
"Mainstream consumers are remarkably gullible,
and few understand any technical specs at all."

This "AA-stuffed-into-a-D-cylinder" cheat goes way back to the Olde
NiCad days. I've also seen NiCad C cells stuffed into D cylinders, too.
Jonesy

The D battery has a "Sub-C" or "2/3 C" cell inside, not a AA. These
Sub-C cells are commonly used in rechargeable power tool battery
packs.

Incidentally, the adapter was patented in 1983:
<http://www.google.com/patents?id=_UcuAAAAEBAJ&dq=4397920>
 
C

clifto

Ron(UK) said:
When I was a kid, maybe 9 or 10, my dad bought me a Heathkit Jr
electronics workshop for Christmas, Included in the box were four C
sized red and yellow RayOVac cells. Here in England, I'd never seen that
make of batteries before, and those four cells lasted for years,
whatever they made them from, they should reintroduce it!

RayOVac is my main brand these days. I find the quality to be as high as
any other battery, and the price is attractive.

I remember them way back when, too, with a cat and a lightning bolt on the
package.
 
Top