P
Paul Burridge
As posted to alt.binaries.electronics.schematics under the same
subject title.
p.
subject title.
p.
As posted to alt.binaries.electronics.schematics under the same
subject title.
Paul Burridge said:As posted to alt.binaries.electronics.schematics under the same
subject title.
p.
Paul Burridge wrote...
Haha, ROFLOL, show us the other side!
**** off.
Paul Burridge said:And a very good night to you too, my good man.
Excuse me, **** off.
It's an initiative test, Win. I'm taking a leaf out of Jim Thompson's
book. You don't necessarily *need* to see the other side to work out
what it is if you use your mind and think carefully...
That's enough clues for tonight. I'm off to bed!
Paul Burridge said:As posted to alt.binaries.electronics.schematics under the same
subject title.
p.
My money says it might be an FQP85N06. In this former thread:
http://tinyurl.com/2zc8w
I believe you indicated you destroyed one of these parts. ...
Clue, smue. There's no way to definitively identify that FET,
I have dozens of types that look like that from the back. We
could guess, but why bother?
OK, OK, is it one of the TO-220
FETs from this list I posted as a suggestion to you last year?
My money says it might be an FQP85N06. In this former thread:
http://tinyurl.com/2zc8w
I believe you indicated you destroyed one of these parts. Since these are
TO-220 devices, and they are of the right voltage and current capability
that might be found in battlebots, this seems like one possible conclusion.
The other images in the directory appear to relate to battlebots (with the
exception of the female brain which is quite entertaining), and in that
previous thread you appeared to be interested in high current motor control
which could also likely be related to battlebots. The grime on the package
could also be considered as consistent with this theory.
Fritz Schlunder wrote...
But the pictured part has never been used.
I bought six of 'em from Farnell at the time and mentioned that
in passing. This is one of the unused spares. You were *so* close
but should have paid closer attention at the time.
Paul Burridge wrote...
Believe me, I was paying NO attention at the time, and very little
at any other time. That's my story, and I'm sticking to it. :>)