M
Michael A. Terrell
Terry said:Yeah, a real smart system. Whats the next wire size larger than 0000 AWG?
The ))) type numbers were added long after the original system was
developed. How often do you wind a transformer with ))) wire, anyway?
I stand by my original comments, that circular mils are a stupid,
arbitrary and useless measure. WTF is wrong with conductor diameter?
Dude, R = Rho(T)*length/area, baby physics. Circular mils serve only to
complicate the matter unnecessarily.
Circular mils is very simple, if you think about it. You select the
rating you want: E.G.: 750 circular mils/amp * the current required and
take a look at the chart to select the wire, or a small range that will
work. Its worked for generations, whether you like it or not.
Even the "cookbook" approach becomes more complex, more stupid numbers
popping up everywhere, the almost complete lack of which is the main
advantage of the MKS system (hence the term "rational").
Use whatever you can wrap your mind around.
Another great example of stupid numbers is the penchant for using the
"transformer" equation. 4.44 is a pretty stupid number. E = wNBA is far
more meaningful.
I guess you would like to round pi off to 3.000? Personally, I just
write small programs to plug the numbers in and let it spit out the
answer. Do it once, and you're done. AWG wire is what is available to
me in the US. No matter how you feel about your metric wire gauges, its
irrelevant if I can't pick up a spool without ordering it from another
county.
--
Link to my "Computers for disabled Veterans" project website deleted
after threats were telephoned to my church.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida