D
Don Y
Hi Matt,
Ah, OK.
I've seen numerous colors: yellow, red, ubiquitous_black, etc.
At first, I was excited thinking there might be some color code
that would make sorting out what's what easier. But, that didn't
pan out.
So, a micrometer and selection of drill bits are my only real way of
figuring out what the characteristics of a particular connector are.
Great tolerance there! :>
I am more interested in understanding how/why particular sizes
are chosen as there doesn't seem to be any sense to it all.
It *seems* US firms have the barrel negative wrt center post.
And, many far east firms the opposite.
Except when they aren't! :<
Yes, but the connectors are more fragile and harder to mate.
I've had to replace a number of jacks -- laptops, organs/"keyboards",
etc. Usually devices that ither see lots of motion while in use
*or* have heavy cords dangling off the connection, unsupported.
I've also encountered broken "wipers" in the jack (the contact
that mates with the O.D.)
I figured connectors with a *longer* and *wider* barrel might be
more mechanically secure -- not just because of the increased
size but, also, because they could be more readily "supported"
by bits of the device into which they mate (even if that support
is non-conductive)
I've also seen connectors that have quarter-turn locks built in.
Insert and rotate to keep it from falling out (or being PULLED out)
I think the biggest risk, there, is a "plug" with a "too large" I.D.
being *apparently* mated to one with the correct O.D. but smaller
I.D. -- not a very robust connection (if at all!)
Exactly my thoughts (electrically). Let it feed anoher (set of)
converters inside the device. More assurance that you have *all*
the right supplies instead of HOPING to have the *one* right input
supply.
Ah, hadn't thought of that! Hadn't *planned* on such a connector,
though. Worth remembering for future encounters!
Yes. Looks sort of like the *mate* to the "original style"
(hence my reason to call it "inverse")
Ahhhhh! Yes, that makes perfect sense! I'd simply assumed the outside
of the barrel was one conductor (like it had been for the "original"
plugs) and the pin was there just to "be different". The larger
diameter and length that typically are associated with these being
mechanical "enhancements" -- e.g., laptops see a fair bit of motion
reflected to that connection!
OK. Allows the PS to be "identified" by the device using it.
Presumably, could also ensure the supply isn't powered up if
t is "wrong"!
Could also be used to power *down* the power supply when the device
doesn't need it any longer!
Or, could just be there to sell "special powersupplies" :-(
Ah, OK. Clever. So, charge time depends on power supply and not
something inherent in the device! Yes, that makes perfect sense!
And, of course, the truth is probably somewhere in between.
Thanks! That makes things a lot clearer! I will have to get a bright
light and loupe and peer *in* the end of the plug. There should be
a conductive surface there in addition to the pin.
(and, *probing* would obviously be something done with care lest
"something" get shorted to the pin!)
There is a Japanese standard for these, that Sony and Nintendo equipment
seems to follow. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIAJ_connector The
diameter goes up with voltage.
Ah, OK.
The standard doesn't seem to require it,
but it seems popular for the defined voltage to not be an even number.
The insulator at the tips of these plugs is usually yellow, at least on
Sony and Nintendo gear.
I've seen numerous colors: yellow, red, ubiquitous_black, etc.
At first, I was excited thinking there might be some color code
that would make sorting out what's what easier. But, that didn't
pan out.
So, a micrometer and selection of drill bits are my only real way of
figuring out what the characteristics of a particular connector are.
For "regular" plugs, the most common OD is probably 5.5 mm, with either
a 2.1 mm or 2.5 mm ID. The voltage and current can be anything at all,
up to maybe 50 W, +/- 50 W.
Great tolerance there! :>
If you want your customers to be able to improvise a supply, pick a
common size. If you want to sell them power supplies and/or cause them
to go to the competition, pick a weird size.
I am more interested in understanding how/why particular sizes
are chosen as there doesn't seem to be any sense to it all.
It *seems* US firms have the barrel negative wrt center post.
And, many far east firms the opposite.
Except when they aren't! :<
I don't know what brands are good or bad, but I'd probably look for a
"name brand" like Switchcraft or Hirose first, and then look for
something cheaper when the bean counters scream.
A lot of smaller devices seem to have standardized on USB connectors,
which are almost always good for 5 V, 0.5 A; higher currents are
available but you can't always count on this. The main advantage is
that you can be pretty sure that the voltage will be between 5.0 and
5.5 V, and that the polarity will be right.
Yes, but the connectors are more fragile and harder to mate.
I've actually had more failures of the wire right behind the plug than
I have had of the plugs or the jacks. I would tend to trust a through-
hole jack more than a surface mount one, especially if the plug will
be disconnected and reconnected often.
I've had to replace a number of jacks -- laptops, organs/"keyboards",
etc. Usually devices that ither see lots of motion while in use
*or* have heavy cords dangling off the connection, unsupported.
I've also encountered broken "wipers" in the jack (the contact
that mates with the O.D.)
I figured connectors with a *longer* and *wider* barrel might be
more mechanically secure -- not just because of the increased
size but, also, because they could be more readily "supported"
by bits of the device into which they mate (even if that support
is non-conductive)
I've also seen connectors that have quarter-turn locks built in.
Insert and rotate to keep it from falling out (or being PULLED out)
These are more of a design thing, but: one "failure mode" might be that
if the plug even remotely sort of fits, people will try to cram it into
the socket, so you might get all kinds of unexpected voltages coming in.
I think the biggest risk, there, is a "plug" with a "too large" I.D.
being *apparently* mated to one with the correct O.D. but smaller
I.D. -- not a very robust connection (if at all!)
A fuse with a "backwards" diode after it guards against wrong polarity;
guarding against too-high voltage is a little trickier. If you can
stand the voltage drop, board space, and budget, put in a bridge
rectifier and a capacitor, so the user can use any AC or DC power supply
of some minimum voltage.
Exactly my thoughts (electrically). Let it feed anoher (set of)
converters inside the device. More assurance that you have *all*
the right supplies instead of HOPING to have the *one* right input
supply.
Also, some of the jacks have switches that open or close on plug
insertion. Some devices use these to switch between internal or
external power. Some users, though, might prefer to leave the plug
connected all the time, and remove the AC power from the power supply
instead; your device might not be able to rely on the switch contact
in the jack.
Ah, hadn't thought of that! Hadn't *planned* on such a connector,
though. Worth remembering for future encounters!
Are you talking about the ones that have a pin inside the barrel? As
Yes. Looks sort of like the *mate* to the "original style"
(hence my reason to call it "inverse")
far as I know, this is to offer an extra "data" channel to the power
supply; these are really 3-circuit connectors. The outside surface of
the barrel is one side of the power supply (usually negative), the
inside surface of the barrel is the other (usually positive), and the
Ahhhhh! Yes, that makes perfect sense! I'd simply assumed the outside
of the barrel was one conductor (like it had been for the "original"
plugs) and the pin was there just to "be different". The larger
diameter and length that typically are associated with these being
mechanical "enhancements" -- e.g., laptops see a fair bit of motion
reflected to that connection!
pin is "data". The "data" can be as simple as a resistor to one side
of the power supply, which the connected device measures and interprets,
or as complex as a serial bus to a microcontroller or ROM inside the
power supply.
OK. Allows the PS to be "identified" by the device using it.
Presumably, could also ensure the supply isn't powered up if
t is "wrong"!
Could also be used to power *down* the power supply when the device
doesn't need it any longer!
Or, could just be there to sell "special powersupplies" :-(
The "data" can be used for good or for evil. A good use is that the
cheap 20 volt 3 amp supply has (say) a 1K resistor to ground, and the
more expensive 20 volt 5 amp supply has (say) a 2K resistor to ground.
The connected device has an A/D that tells it what resistor is there,
and then it can adjust its internal switching power supply appropriately
to only draw as much current as the external supply is capable of.
(Laptops often do this; they *have* to power the CPU and then the
battery gets whatever is "left over".)
Ah, OK. Clever. So, charge time depends on power supply and not
something inherent in the device! Yes, that makes perfect sense!
An evil use is to require the
power supply to authenticate to the connected device, in order to sell
power supplies at inflated prices^W^W^W^W^W^Wprotect the consumer.
And, of course, the truth is probably somewhere in between.
Thanks! That makes things a lot clearer! I will have to get a bright
light and loupe and peer *in* the end of the plug. There should be
a conductive surface there in addition to the pin.
(and, *probing* would obviously be something done with care lest
"something" get shorted to the pin!)