D
DarkMatter
It is indeed cause to wonder when someone who claims to have
been using Usenet that long says they've always top posted and
never saw it any other way or heard any complaints. That is
utterly ridiculous!
Very much so. He must have been over at Rusty and Eddie's most of
the time.
And it is all the more foolish given that
we all have access to the google archives and can go *look* at
how it was being done "13+" years ago.
I didn't even have to look.
I just now took a look at about 50 articles from the first few
months of this group's existence in 1995. 1 top posted article,
and that was a 1 liner, quoting only 3 lines of text and telling
the guy he was in the wrong newsgroup.
I then went back to 1990, and pulled up a dozen threads that had
more than 10 articles. Not a single article that I saw used top
posting.
In fact, one can search for "top posting" or for "bottom
posting", and discover that *neither* of term was even used
(with the meaning we are talking about) on Usenet until about
1997, and didn't become common until 1998... which incidentally
coincides with Microsoft finally having discovered The Internet
and we became plagued with people using Outhouse Express under
the mistaken impression that it was a newsreader...
E X A C T L Y !!!
It is Billy's fault, for sure, but the mentality of Billy's user
base's mean aptitude must be considered as well.
Some don't even know what cursor keys are, or do. Some don't even
know what the word "cursor" means.
Incidentally, I've been on Usenet a bit longer than any 13
years, and what I found on google's archives confirmed exactly
what I remembered. I don't think Col is a retard, nor simply
mistaken either. He's a liar.
They just want to poke at me. I came back to MACTARD's post, he got
pissed, and subsequently puppy dogged every post I had made that day.
We all know what kind of troll THAT is.
No. I make NO consolation for idiots that insist on posting in a
forum in which they refuse to find out a damned thing about.
Billy should be publicly stoned.