Maker Pro
Maker Pro

Anyone have the stats on how much power the normal computer uses?

R

Ross Mac

DarkMatter said:
That's it... placate the retard, you stupid bastard!

What's the matter FecalMatter? Can't you handle a dissenting opinion? I
really like your new nickname! Let's add it to the list:

DimBulb
TardMatter
Don'tMatter
DickMatter
DarkBlather
FecalMatter
and more!
 
R

Ross Mac

DarkMatter said:
Yes, but idiots like you were not on it then. There were no PCs
then, you retard.

Are you going to lie, and tell us that your access was NOT via a
BBS?

He DID use the word Usenet....not PC and not BBS....
You really should put down that bong...it severly clouds your posting and
judgement kid!
 
R

Ross Mac

DarkMatter said:
You're a goddamned retard. What is being referred to is pixel
persistence. It isn't about "the way they were made", it is inherent
in ALL LCD displays.

It is why there is no *apparent* flicker. It is also why LCD
displays SUCK badly for gameplay or ANY scenes that have a lot of
motion in them. It's called blurr. You know, like your brain.

CRTs do not give any eye strain, as long as the idiot using it knows
how to set the refresh properly. DOH!

You're a goddamned retard, old man. I know more about CRTs and LCD
displays than you or any google search you do will ever allow your
lame ass to glean.

Yeah...just ask him....he knows more about everything and anything than
anyone. Fire up that bong kid and try to sell us the Golden Gate
Bridge!............
 
R

Ross Mac

DarkMatter said:
Yes, and if all you retards DID learn about and post to Usenet
correctly, NONE of these conversations would be occurring.
Fact is, most idiots find something via google search and select
"reply", one of the MOST retarded ways of starting in Usenet.

Many are to blame. You are one. Slack fucktard.

Get a clue.

Such a wonderful command of the language! It REALLY helps to make your sorry
case doper boy. Loosen up that rubber helmet and break out a dictionary you
monosyllabic prevaricating troll!
 
R

Ross Mac

DarkMatter said:
No dipshit. As usual, you adjust facts to make yourself look
"good". Yeah... you look like a good retard, boy.

I plonked you ONE time. It was a test. You failed. In this
post... you lied. Not much has changed about how lame you are.

Make it up as you go....I have seen your plonk announcements for some time
now! Interesting, first you call me an old man, then boy...well what is it
ya rubber helmeted, bicycle pantsed, bong yielding, toothless woosy boy???
 
B said:
FecalMatter doesn't understand why people top post.
No one is interested in
reading any thing he has said or will say.

That's not true.

<snip>

By bottom posting, you know exactly what I am referring
to. If I had top posted "that's not true" you would not
know.
 
C

Col

Are you saying,

the usenet that you imply wasnt there in 1992 was accessed through a bbs?
interesting contradiction

or are you saying that access to usenet though a bbs does not count?

or are you saying that without PCs there was no usenet?

or are you saying that for the 2 years until the first ibm pc was made
usenet was a figment of a small band of peoples imagination?

or that I`ve only ever accessed usenet on a pc and then only after 1992

just wondered
Col.


PS it scares me to think you ever had anything to do with any millitary
anywhere. still it might have been your parents I suppose ( who incidently
should never have been alowed to breed)
My god I have sunk to your level on this, my last post in this thread.
Still never mind ;-)
 
R

Ross Mac

Floyd Davidson said:
It is indeed cause to wonder when someone who claims to have
been using Usenet that long says they've always top posted and
never saw it any other way or heard any complaints. That is
utterly ridiculous! And it is all the more foolish given that
we all have access to the google archives and can go *look* at
how it was being done "13+" years ago.

I just now took a look at about 50 articles from the first few
months of this group's existence in 1995. 1 top posted article,
and that was a 1 liner, quoting only 3 lines of text and telling
the guy he was in the wrong newsgroup.

I then went back to 1990, and pulled up a dozen threads that had
more than 10 articles. Not a single article that I saw used top
posting.

In fact, one can search for "top posting" or for "bottom
posting", and discover that *neither* of term was even used
(with the meaning we are talking about) on Usenet until about
1997, and didn't become common until 1998... which incidentally
coincides with Microsoft finally having discovered The Internet
and we became plagued with people using Outhouse Express under
the mistaken impression that it was a newsreader...

Incidentally, I've been on Usenet a bit longer than any 13
years, and what I found on google's archives confirmed exactly
what I remembered. I don't think Col is a retard, nor simply
mistaken either. He's a liar.

Do I detect a "Troll Tagteam" here? On one side we have "Floyd The Bear
Humpin' Anal Retentive" and "Dark The Retard Baby Bullshit Usenet Plonkin
Fecal Matter" versus anyone who does not conform to their wishes?????
 
C

Col

Sorry floyd but when did I say or imply "says they've always top posted
and never saw it any other way or heard any complaints" I said, to quote


"top posting does it really matter for gods sake?

Am I the only old annorak whos been using usenet for 13+ yrs in one form or
another that isnt offended by the dreaded top posting, it saves my scroll
wheel a lot of work. ;-)"

Where are you comming from? I know its late/early but come on.

col.
 
K

Kilowatt

I still vote for top posting.

DarkMatter said:
It isn't about voting, dipshit. It IS bout you following the norms
and conventions of the forums in which you invade.

You "don't follow the rules" x gen punks are the most criminal
mindset retards this country has ever seen.
 
K

Kilowatt

Sorry.
I understand where the missunderstanding comes in now.
You seem to think I give a **** what you think.
This is very wrong.
 
K

Kilowatt

Top posting is just as easy to follow when done in reverse. But I know I am
not going to change your mind. I perfer to read top posted message and I am
going to continue.
 
B

B J Conner

In the military!! You couldn't make through the military no sooner that you
could make it through the engineering school. Did you learn all those words
from you moms "clients"?
 
R

Ross Mac

B J Conner said:
In the military!! You couldn't make through the military no sooner that you
could make it through the engineering school. Did you learn all those words
from you moms "clients"?

It's FecalMatters one page dictionary!....If he was in the military he would
have been fragged and we wouldn't have to read his vitreolic posts!......
 
R

Romy

bushbadee said:
You made quite a few assumptions that were not true.
Ummm, actually no, you did.

17 inch panel monitors sell at Costco for as low as 350 dollars and I have
seen the cheaper at Tigerdirect.
That would make them about CDN$500, the same number I used for my
calculation

A 19 inch monitor is closer to 200 or more watts.
They are generally rated at about 250 watts
My 19" Dell is 180W, I just checked 10 seconds ago.

I do not live in the tennesee valley and do not pay 9.2 cents per killowhat
hour.
I pay about 26.2 cents per kilowatt hour plus tax.
I do not live in the Tennesse Valley either, I live in Toronto. I pay CDN
$0.092 per kWh.

My 17 inch panel monitor has a 40 watt supply and it runs cool so I assume
the monitor is using a lot less than 40 watts unless the screen is a bright
white and I do not run it at full brightness.
I would assume it uses closer to 10 watts with a blue , but not full
brightness desk top.( Just one color on verses all three)
Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't. But there are LCD monitors which draw 0.75A
@ 100v-120v,
see http://www.necmitsubishi.com/products/home/nec_index.cfm

Now the final insult.
When you want to get rid of your tube monitor, better not just dump it in
the garbage.
I won't, I'll dump it on the front lawn.

You might find a citation on your door if you do.
Not likely.

What you do with it, and you can not donate it as no one seems to want them,
is drive (at least for me) about 90 miles to a hazardous waste site and pay
them to take it off your hands.
No, I pick up the phone and tell the city I'd like a bulk pick-up, which was
free the last time I used it.

Of course you can do what ssome city inspector told me to do with it.
Leave it in an alley and some one will surely steal it.
Maybe someone will pick it up from my front lawn?

But I tried that with an obsolete portable computer and I got all sorts of
calls telling me I had forgotten it some wheres, please come and pick it up.
Why did you put your phone number on your garbage?

No flat pannels are a lot cheaper now and I guess that is why they now
outsell tube monitors.
Well, they are kinda cool.

Take a course in accounting and

Put those figures in your calculator.
I don't see how that would help, but before I finish this email, I'll have
done both. Anything else I should do to help you look smarter?

YOu remind me of my son when I used to tell him it cost 50 cents a mile to
drive a car he used to laugh at me.
Now he is an accountant he tells that I am not figuring in all the expenses
and it costs even more.
So you lied to your son? Or was it just that you didn't know what you were
talking about?

I just bought a new set of premioum 85000 mile tires for $400.
I will be lucky to get 10,000 miles out of them so that by next winter at
the start of the season I will buy a new set and have fresh treads for the
winter.
I don't know how you treat your car, or what kind of tires you buy. But
something obviously isn't right, you've done this for how many seasons? I
get many years out of my performance (not exactly known to be long lasting)
tires, probably 60-70,000 kms. I'm a 23yr old single male, I drive an Audi
A4, and yeah, I do take it to the limits.

Thats 4 cents a mile just for tires.
You're paying too much IMO.

I get great milage driving down the mountain.
But pretty lousy driving up the mountain.
So it all averages out?


BTW, since you never corrected my initial calculations, I'll assume they're
correct. Oh and before I forget, now that I've completed my accounting
course, and plugged in your values, I can tell you it's going to take you
about 5.55 years to recoup the additional cost of your LCD monitor.



Romy
 
D

DarkMatter

What's the matter FecalMatter? Can't you handle a dissenting opinion?

Could you be any MORE retarded?

This is not about opinions, retard boy. It is about conformance.

You stop at red lights because if you do not, you will cause an
accident, or get cited for it. We do it, because that is how it gets
done. It's called convention.

You follow usenet protocols, because THAT is how it is to be done.
Convention. If you ignore them, then we should all ignore you. The
more perfect solution would be if you lame fucks could get an ass
kicking, and a big sign plastered on your face to remind you what THAT
particular ass kicking was for, because dipshits like you would be
getting them, all the time.

You cannot possibly make ANY claim to manhood while sporting such
serious character flaws, dipshit. Then, you sound just like the
little adolescent dweebs do when THEY get called on it...

" I like reading it from the top...." " I don't like scrolling
down..." ya fucking retards!
I really like your new nickname! Let's add it to the list:

More clues as to your maturity level, or lack thereof. You fall in
at NIL.
 
D

DarkMatter

He DID use the word Usenet....not PC and not BBS....
You really should put down that bong...it severly clouds your posting and
judgement kid!

You need to learn to read threads, dipshit. You are lost.
 
D

DarkMatter

Yeah...just ask him....he knows more about everything and anything than
anyone. Fire up that bong kid and try to sell us the Golden Gate
Bridge!............

Do YOU build CRTs, you retarded ****? NO.

I do.
 
D

DarkMatter

Make it up as you go....I have seen your plonk announcements for some time
now! Interesting, first you call me an old man, then boy...well what is it
ya rubber helmeted, bicycle pantsed, bong yielding, toothless woosy boy???


Find them, you lying ****! Like I said. I made one plonk. It was
you. You are too goddamned retarded to even back up your own lying
bullshit.
 
D

DarkMatter

the usenet that you imply wasnt there in 1992 was accessed through a bbs?
interesting contradiction

I never said a goddamned thing about it not being there you retard.

Usenet began in 1972. So you were wrong about that as well.
 
Top