D
DaveC
Thus spake Keith:
OP, here.
I have 73 and 77. Both work quite well, also. The only reason I'm looking for
another meter is that neither of these are true RMS reading meters. Mfr of
equipment I'm servicing is spec'ing pulsed DC voltage as an RMS value. I
can't accurately measure this with these meters.
I've been quite happy with these meters, but I need true RMS measurement, and
my eyes would appreciate larger display and a backlight. I've been eying the
Fluke 87, but would like to at least see what *doesn't* measure up to the
Fluke before I plunk down the $$.
Thanks,
I agree. I've had Fluke 77s for fifteen years. The only reason I bought a
bunch of $4 HarborFreights was that my Flukes had a habit of taking a
walkabout. One hasn't been seen in 12 years. THe HF's can now go walk. BTW,
I've only replaced the batteries in the 77s once in those fifteen years.
They still work quite well.
OP, here.
I have 73 and 77. Both work quite well, also. The only reason I'm looking for
another meter is that neither of these are true RMS reading meters. Mfr of
equipment I'm servicing is spec'ing pulsed DC voltage as an RMS value. I
can't accurately measure this with these meters.
I've been quite happy with these meters, but I need true RMS measurement, and
my eyes would appreciate larger display and a backlight. I've been eying the
Fluke 87, but would like to at least see what *doesn't* measure up to the
Fluke before I plunk down the $$.
Thanks,